Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~ 64~ Craig Benedict: It is a broader definition that creates mare restrictions. Again, that full conte;,t of the document and ho~~ its used 649 with a better understanding of it shows that we are tightening our regulations especially in the Rural Buffer and AR. 650 65 ~ tarry Wright: We are actually get~ng control? 652 653 Craig I~PnPdict: YPs. That's correct. There ~~ere parts of o~~r old zoning and suhdi~~ision code that ~vere definitions from the cgs 654 ~ and 70s. We have cleared up a lot of that with our new definition section. vile spoke about this earlier, there is some archaic 655 language. We are going to have to approach mare in the future but you can see haw this one little language nuance really flared 656 up quite a few letters sv we baps that clarifies it. We will be issuing a response letter as the Commissioners suggested to send 657 back to the Ivcal governments as well as any changes we make. , 65~ 659 Pete HaClenbeck: What you just described was in response to concerns that I believe Mike Hughes had when he was talking 660 about wastewater systems and so forth' 66~ 662 Craig Benedict: Yes, 663 564 Pete l~lallenbeck; Thank you. 665 666 Judith Wegner: I am sorry to be trying to focus an time but I wanted to go ahead and ask if we can move the staff 667 recammendation about public interest district? It is a separate sheet that was handed out saying that you remove the public 66~ interest district CZ designation and return public interest district to General Use District with modifcations any other technical 669 modifications as needed to be completed by staff. 670 67~ Craig Benedict: There was no major reason fo have it in one place or the other. I think if we go back to General Use District, if 672 the government ever wanted to designate that to a certain property, we could. It might give us a little mare ability fio zone 673 something. The government cannot put a Conditional District on somebody's property. That has to be applicant based, PID 674 was in General Use Districts before but we think this amendment is acceptable and this was mentioned at the public hearing, 675 We think its minorenough and there are no ensuing complications with this change, 676 677 MoT~o~: Judith Wegner moved that the Planning Board approve staffs recammendation regarding Public Interest District ~PID}K 67~ Seconded by Samantha Cabe 679 ~o~E: Unanimous 6~0 . 6~ ~ Judith Wegner: If you would give me the honor to respond to Commissioner Gordan's fax and see if people agree to this. On 6~2 page 2, l am just going to comment and see if we ail understand what we have done tonight and how that intersects. 6~3 6~4 Brian Crawford: Does everyone have a copy? 6~5 6~6 Judith Wegner: As to item 1, Location of Conditional Districts, what we did was to limit the Master Planned District, which is the 6~7 principal one of concern, to Ecariomic Development Districts and the Rural Community Nodes. Moreover, we 6~~ just said that Public Interest Districts which is another type of Conditional District, is going to be moved to no 6~9 longer being a Conditional District. it's going to be a General District. She wanted the Eland Cheeks Overlay 690 District to be designated, That isn't currently on the map that way. I don't think that is appropriate to be done 69 ~ ~ now. She asked particularly that We should answer every one of her particular comments and questions so I 692 am doing my best. 693 694 Number 2, Linking Canditianal Districts to the Comprehensive Plan, we spent a lot of time discussing that. The 695 stafr in fact presented us with draft language, good job staff, and C am sure you will be commended by 696 Commissioner Gordon. The particulars an that were after considered discussion we believe based an what 697 Samantha said that it would be an inadvisable tv start putting~references in a few places and not every place so 69~ there would be some inference that it applied in certain places and not others. Moreover, we believe that 699 careful reading elsewhere in the existing document repeatedly references the Comprehensive Plan. 700 70~ Number 3, Special Use Permit in the Ganditional Zoning Districts ~CZDs~, she seems to be Talking about, I am 702 not sure she's using the right terminology here because we've been discussing Conditional Use Districts and 703 Conditional Districts, so when she says Conditional Zoning Districts 1 am not sure What she is after. However, 704 as to Conditional Use Districts, Special Use Permits are part of that and we in effect have [invited the 705 Conditional Districts to getting rid of the Public Interest District and targeting the Master Planned #ypes of these ~2