Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~~~ 472 for, in that case it was a PD but now it wiCl be Conditional District, you can exceed that limit. we thought that it could be 473 exceeded because they have to request, They have to specifically request back to the Commissioners and it's not a by right, 474 That's why it can exceed that area. ~. 475 476 Samantha Cabe Really what does this amendment do to what is already there? 477 478 Craig Benedict: what this amendment does is to focus Master Planned Developments whCCh have to be at [east five acres ~n 479 size, it focuses them in our urbanizing sections of the County. It doesn't allow a wider distribution of a master planned 484 development. 48 ~ ~ w ~ ' nd be 482 Brian Crawford: what was this comment made that the ~IPD CZ could be put our in Cedar Grove an a farm somewhere a 483 approved. That was the comment that was made. 484 485 Craig Benedict: what we kind of heard from the public, ll~aster Planned DevGlapment will gEVe a specific I~st of uses but you 486 won't see exactly what's going to happen there so there's a little more speculation. we think the application of MPDs will most 487 likely be in an urban area sa it's not like we're forcing things out of an area, vile da think that's an important economic 488 development foal sv we want to at least preserve them within those urban transition areas of the County and the Rural 489 Community Hades. 494 , , ~ 491 Pete Hallenbeck: The speedway area that's been brought up by public comment, is it in any of those areas or ~s it in the green , 492 493 Craig Benedict: A recommendation of that Small Area Plan was to create another zone, like another Rural Community Node and 494 we'd have to add that to the map then it would allow different mixed use. 495 496 Pete Hallenbeck: That was my concern with this. There has been a lot of talk about that and I've been in that area and ~t seems 497 like it's a new emerging economic area. l wanted to make sure it wouldn't block it out and by way of restating to make sure I 498 understand fihe SmaIl~Area Plan for the speedway area would allow this to happen. 499 544 Craig Benedict: Yes, it would inform that in that and there~are recommendations an hold from the Plan that would begin to 5 ~ 1 proceed with if we get Phase 1 out. Yau are correct. 542 543 Alan Campbell: So the old Planned Development procedure could be done in the green? 544 545 Craig Benedict: Previously, yes, 546 547 Alan Campbell: Now we're taking that away, part of it. 548 549 Craig Benedict: Part of it. 510 511 Alan Campbell: we're making it more restrictive which is really a Phase 2, theoretically, adjustment but staff is recommending it 512 now. I'm okay with this... 513 514 Brian Crawford: The thing is if we go back to that Comprehensive Plan and one of the language that the Comprehensive Plan 515 puts forward is that new development is either going to be a Small Area Plan or the transition area. 516 517 Alan Campbell: Practically speaking, you couldn't do it because of the Comprehensive Plan. 518 519 Brian Crawford; Right, when someone comes in with a proposal like that we say, look this is not what the Comprehensive Plan 524 had in mind. 521 522 Alan Campbell, If we left it in it would override the Comprehensive Plan or not? 523 524 Brian Crawford: No. 525 526 Alan Campbell: So we've already gat that limitation. 527 528 Brian Crawford: Right, I guess the point about this whole exercise..,... 529 118 9