Agenda - 04-05-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1 1 f ~~ X41.3 especially when it is Already there. Thirdly, just from a practical paint of view, this is already a very complicated dacun~enfi and fio 41.4 keep restating things that mean the same thing over and over buT using different language just makes it more complicated. I feel 415 like, though I missed the public hearing, that a lot of times the public doesn't have the big picture as far they focus an one little 41. ~ thing. Yes, this language is missing fram the Conditional Use section in the new UDO but they missed that link to the 417 Comprehensive Plan. They maybe didn't understand the difference in applying it comprehensively and rather than try to 41 a piecemeal it into different sections. That's my reasoning behind my motion and why I think we should reject adding this language 419 though I appreciate staff rushing to put this together. 420 421 Brian Crawford; is the motion seconded that the staff suggestions to revise the language be rejected? Any further discussion? 422 423 I~o7~o~. Samantha Gabe moved that the Planning Board reject the inclusion of the language that's suggested 'rn Attachment 1 424 and Attachment 4 of the Preamble to the Post Quarterly Hearing UDO Planning Board Meeting and naT recommend these 425 changes To the UDO. Seconded by Alan Campbell. 426 ~o~~. Unanimous 427 42O Craig Benedict: That's great progress, thank you very much. Item 2 on the Preamble to the Post Quarterly Hearing UDO 429 Planning Board Meeting has to do with Conditional Districts buT a Upecifc typo of Conditional District and that is Master Planned 430 Developments also known as MPD-CZ. There was concern expressed by the public and a Commissioner that these Master 431 Planned Development are typically larger scale and there is some unknowns in there. because you do not see final site plans. 432 They maybe mare appropriate in some of the urban sections of the County, urban transition areas as we call them, economic 433 development zones, commercial industrial Hades, and less appropriate for the rural areas of the Gaunty. Just to recap, there are 434 roughly two categories under Conditional District; Conditional Use, we're still suggesting that Conditional Use Districts can be 435 used in the rural areas of the County, and of course they can be used in the urban areas. Conditional Use Districts, there's a lot 436 afthem thatcannot be asked far there were 31 exclusions and there was another4g commercial and industrial uses that are not 437 allowed in this green area oaf fie Orange Caunfy Land Use ~lap~ if there is a critical area ar protected area fram University Lake. 43 o There are ~a further exclusions from Conditional Use Districts in those purple areas. Conditional Use can still be requested in 439 these areas. vtiChaT we're suggesting where these MPDs, which do not include a site plan and do noT include a Special Use 440 Permit, that at least in Phase 1 they be linked to our urban county areas where there is the intention of public water and sewer 441 and also in our staff recommendation that they be in other higher intensity land use areas such as our Rural Activity Nodes or 442 rural Hades. If there's not going To be public water and sewer in those rural nodes but we think there is some consistency With 443 the intention in our minimal rural activity areas ~pafnted out an t.and Use Map} that MPD-CZs could still be allowed in those rural 444 nodes and. all of the urbanizing areas. 445 446 Judith ~legner; ~Ihat you gave us only references, does not reference the smaller ones it's only the larger ones. It says Rural 44? Activity Nodes. 44~ 449 Tom Altieri: That encampasseshoth. 450 451 Judith ~legner: Gould you refer to what is the difFerence beTween community and neighborhood? 452 453 Michael Harvey, Typically, the answer to that question is size, bath rural neighborhood and rural community activity nodes allow 454 for LC-1 and NC-Z zoning designations, 455 . 456 Judith ~legner; I thought that was about scale of development and the compilation patterns there so I don't understand why the 457 smaller~sense of these... I'd prefer to split it at the larger ones if this is a first phase implementation, i think the smaller ones need 45~ To be Thought though with those communities mare,,.. 459 460 Graig Benedict: That's acceptable. 461 462 Judith v~egner; So what would the terminology be then compared to what you have here as rural.... 463 464 Craig Benedict: Rural Community Node. 465 466 Samantha Cabe: I'm missing something here, da all the standards that go along with the different, for example the acreage that 467 can be zoned as commercial would within a Rural Activity Node, is all of that disregarded When someone applies for an MPD- 46~ GZ? 469 470 Craig Benedict; Yes, there is a limitation in at least the vUhife Gross Node, Rural Community Node, as 10 acres now as allowed 471 of NC-~ and 1 Q acres of l.G-1. There was when we passed that new ordinance we said if by legislatively and somebody asked