Orange County NC Website
99 <br />Z <br />3 <br />4 <br />6 <br />7 <br />9 <br />~g <br />~~ <br />~.2 <br />~3 <br />~4~ <br />I~ <br />t6 <br />17 <br />l~ <br />~9 <br />~o <br />2~ <br />2Z <br />23 <br />24 <br />~5 <br />~6 <br />27 <br />2~ <br />Z9 <br />30 <br />31 <br />3~ <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />3~ <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />4~ <br />4~ <br />~~` <br />~~ <br />I appreciate this opportunity to address the prcpcsed UDC] and hope thaf you will <br />lake info consideration the effect that Phis ordinance could have an the quality of <br />life cf all the ~°ou~.fy's citizens. <br />Sincerely <br />Linda Finch <br />Architect <br />143 Graff BIu~TraiQ <br />~hape~ ~i~~, ~I~: ~7~1~ <br />Please enter my email of 21~51~ ~ into the public record <br />Please consider requiring a super majority vote an all rezoning requests in the <br />proposed "Conditional Districts" <br />Spot zoning usually involves a very limited number of property owners who are trying <br />to secure special benefits for themselves, without regard for the rights of adjacent <br />landowners. <br />Please consider requiring the petitioner to build out any properties submitted and <br />approved for rezoning under Conditional Use and Conditional honing Districts; if <br />the property is not developed the rezoning should expire and the property revert <br />back to the original zoning and uses This would ensure that the County would <br />gain the additional tax base anticipated in the approval rather than line the <br />pockets of land speculators. <br />Consider restraining the Conditional Use Districts to the existing Commercial, <br />Industrial, and Economic Development Nodes of the county and exclude their <br />use inAgricultural-Residential, Rural Buffer,' Rural Residential, Resource <br />Protection areas and Municipal Town limits and their ExtrawTerritorial <br />Jurisdictions. <br />These Conditional Districts may lead to inharmonious land use patterns. There <br />should be a requirement that the rezoning is compatible with the County's <br />Comprehensive Paln including existing zoning maps. <br />Review the ~f 1181 o Planning Staff Memo to BCCC on changes to the Planning <br />Board duties: <br />,, <br />The current Qrdinance allows them to propose and recommend plans <br />The substituted language in the UDC allows them to re are and ado t lens <br />The adoption of plans is a BDCC duty <br />She pointed out that the Haw River is an area that also needs to be protected <br />and should be included in this. <br />Planning Board membercomments ~-none. <br />~®ard of ~®un~ ~omm~ss~oners' cornmentsv <br />Commissioner Gordan said that Councilmember Penny Rich from Chapel Hill <br />asked her to enterthe fallowing draft resolution into the record; <br />