Minutes - 19980824 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Judson Edeburn, a representative of Duke University, spoke in support of this proposal. He indicated that Duke University has identified parcels that have no research value. This is one of those parcels and they would like to sell this parcel. Mark O'Neal, with Picket Sprouse Real Estate, spoke in support of this proposal. He indicated that Duke University was not aware of the original rezoning of this parcel which occurred in 1984 and were consequently unaware of the restrictions that were being placed upon this land. Its only use as it is currently zoned is for a public facility. This parcel is unmarketable. Duke University believes that the 1984 rezoning of this parcel was done in error and would like to see that error corrected at this time. He expressed concern about the delay that would be caused by tabling this item. In response to a question, Planner David Stancil mentioned that the Board of Commissioners have several options for when to review this. It does not necessarily mean a long delay if it is tabled at this meeting. In response to a question, Mr. O'Neal stated that Duke has been aware of the PID designation for approximately one year. It is currently being advertised as "residential - contingent on the rezoning". He will make that clear to any potential buyer. He also mentioned that Duke contends that they were not properly notified of the original rezoning. Commissioner Halkiotis commented that it was incomprehensible to him that Duke University would be unaware of the original rezoning. These matters are extensively advertised in several local papers. County Attorney Gledhill stated that as far as he is aware all affected parties were notified and normal procedures were followed. Will Endres, a 12 year resident of Orange County, spoke in opposition to this rezoning request. He stated that he has been a naturalist and herbalist for the past 23 years and is an expert at assessing the overall environmental health of a tract of land. This is a unique area that is critical to the water supply of our community. This land needs to be protected in its natural state for the health of our community. Wayne Cash, President of the Eno River Association, spoke in opposition to this proposal. The Eno River Association has recently received funds to study the Upper Eno. This study should take between 9 months to a year to complete. He asked that no action be taken until the study is completed. Ben Lloyd, an adjoining landowner, spoke in support of moving this from Public Interest District. He did mention, however, that his property is a dairy farm and occasionally they spread manure on the fields. He wants to make sure that if this land is developed for residential uses, that the new homeowners are aware that they occasionally will have to deal with the smell associated with the spreading of manure. Hervey McIver, of Hillsborough, spoke in opposition to this amendment. He mentioned that this land is extremely close to the Eno river. Development of this property would jeopardize the water quality and harm everyone. The wildlife corridor for both McGowan Creek and the Eno are located in this area. Finally, he mentioned that Steve Hall indicated that he did not believe that anyone visited this site for the Natural Area Section of the Inventory. In response to a question, David Stancil mentioned that not all of Duke's property was zoned in this manner. S.A.M. Brooks asked if any local governments or water providers were approached about the possibility of their purchasing this land. Mr. O'Neil replied that Orange-Alamance was approached, however, they did not have the funds for this type of a purchase. A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Brown, to table the