Orange County NC Website
RES-2011-028 <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />Resolution in Opposition to Senate Bi118 - No Cap on Number <br />of Charter Schools - in its Current Form <br />Whereas, we are elected by the voters of Orange County to provide funding for, among <br />other critical needs, the education of the students of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City <br />Schools and Orange County Schools systems; and <br />Whereas, as leaders of the County, we are charged with the responsibility for securing <br />and appropriately using funding from multiple sources including federal, state, and local <br />governments, as well as private donations, additional grants, and various fees; and <br />Whereas, both school systems have voluntarily taken affirmative action to secure funds <br />to provide elective programs for their students believing that these programs provide <br />significant benefits for their students beyond the basic education requirements; and <br />Whereas, the North Carolina General Assembly has provided for charter schools in <br />North Carolina and is currently considering Senate Bill 8 - No Cap on Number of <br />Charter Schools, which would expand these schools and redefine their funding; and <br />Whereas, Senate Bill 8 would entitle charter schools to a portion of all funds that flow <br />through local public school system accounts, including: donations from private entities; <br />reimbursement of expenses (such as activity bus fees and gymnasium rental fees); grants <br />that school boards took affirmative action to secure for programs that charter schools <br />choose not to offer (such as Head Start, More-at-Four, and Free and Reduced Lunch); <br />fund balances; and child nutrition funds (which include fees paid by parents and <br />governmental subsidies even when the charter school does not serve lunch); and <br />Whereas, the only funds that Senate Bill 8 would exclude from charter school <br />entitlement would be funds where donor specifications have provided that such funds be <br />accounted for in a particular way, and federal grants restricted as to use; and <br />Whereas, in practice, grantors and donors to public school systems restrict the use of <br />funds but do not specify the manner of accounting; and <br />Whereas, when public school systems receive grants for specific programs such as Head <br />Start and More at Four, the funds must be used solely for the purpose of providing those <br />programs; thus, any portion of these grants shared with charter schools would have to be <br />taken from the current operating budget of the local school system, leading to a reduction <br />in services and/or positions that would otherwise be provided; and <br />Whereas, under Senate Bill 8, charter schools may apply for and secure grants for <br />specific programs at their schools with no obligation to share such monies or donations <br />with any local school system; and <br />Whereas, Senate Bill 8 as proposed would result in a significant disparity of per pupil <br />operating funding in favor of charter schools; and <br />.. <br />