Browse
Search
Minutes - 19980811
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Minutes - 19980811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2015 3:26:01 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:36:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/11/1998
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 08-11-1998
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 08-11-1998
Agenda - 08-11-1998 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 08-11-1998
Agenda - 08-11-1998 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 08-11-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gordon asked how we are going to make a decision on what will be located together <br />and if they will be located together or scattered. <br />Chair Brown said that staff is going to come up with examples of how combined sites are being used <br />around the country. She feels a combined facility could be very attractive and give a new perspective of <br />what we are trying to create here. <br />Commissioner Carey feels we should let staff study the issue and present a plan for public input <br />because it is important to minimize the impact on the public. <br />Chair Brown said that the LOG is having a consultant work on a plan for a Materials Recovery Facility <br />(MRF). The LOG is not headed in the direction of siting all three on one site. <br />John Link suggested that he convey to the towns that the County Commissioners see a need to locate <br />property to site these facilities according to some timetable and have the County staff and the LOG staff <br />look at other examples across the country where these facilities have been colocated. The County <br />Commissioners agreed that the County wants to take a comprehensive approach for solid waste <br />management in Orange County. <br />With reference to overhead #19 on the Greene Tract, Chair Brown made reference to information that <br />she distributed in which she suggested a compromise on the use of the Greene Tract. Specifically, sixty <br />acres of the Greene Tract shall be set aside for use by the County in future solid waste management <br />activities. The balance of the Greene Tract shall remain under the ownership of the current owners, who <br />shall determine its future use. She feels that this should be their first proposal. The second proposal would <br />be that suggested by Chapel Hill and the third proposal would be a counteroffer. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she feels the counterproposal should be cost effective to encourage <br />Chapel Hill to rezone the 60 acres appropriately and to begin the process immediately. <br />With reference to overheads #21, 22, 23 and 24 and #3 and 4 on Chair Brown's proposal for <br />financing, the Board agreed with all the information as stated. <br />Chair Brown made reference to her information she distributed. The Board discussed each of the ten <br />points as listed below: <br />1. County will assume solid waste management responsibility October 1, 1999, to include current and <br />future operations. The Board agreed with #1. <br />2. County will accept transfer of all Chapel Hill solid waste management personnel who are on staff <br />as of September 30, 1998. The Board agreed with #2. <br />3. County shall approve the 1999/2000 solid waste management operating budget. The Board <br />approved #3. <br />4. As part of financing mechanism, all boards should endorse implementation of a "Chapel Hill - <br />Carrboro- Orange County Solid Waste Availability Fee" for all county residents. This was approved above. <br />5. Solid waste operations shall continue to operate as an enterprise fund to the extent possible after <br />the County assumes responsibility; but the County shall have the option of implementing other fees, and shall <br />not be required to use general funds for solid waste management activities. This was approved above. <br />6. All parties will sign the Interlocal Agreement after it has been revised to incorporate modifications. <br />This will be brought back because the agreement needs a lot of revisions based on what everyone agrees to.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).