Browse
Search
Minutes - 19980811
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Minutes - 19980811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2015 3:26:01 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:36:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/11/1998
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 08-11-1998
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 08-11-1998
Agenda - 08-11-1998 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 08-11-1998
Agenda - 08-11-1998 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1998\Agenda - 08-11-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Landfill for disposal of their solid waste. He suggested that they need additional information before they <br />prohibit them from using the Orange County facility. <br />Commissioner Gordon noted that the County's goals are higher than the State's goals and John Link <br />said that the County may reduce these if they want. <br />ATTACHMENT 1 <br />The Board agreed with the "Framework for a Comprehensive Plan for Solid Waste Management in <br />Orange County" as presented in attachment 1 of the agenda packet. <br />ATTACHMENT 2 <br />The Board agreed on the "Goals for the Management of Solid Waste in Orange County" as presented <br />in attachment 2 of the agenda packet. <br />ATTACHMENTS 3 4 5 and 6 - COMMUNITY BENEFITS <br />Chair Brown feels that granting these benefits is an impact from the landfill operation and that <br />LOG funds should be used to pay for these benefits. <br />Commissioner Carey feels that one cent of the sales tax could be appropriated by all entities <br />for this purpose, and if that is not agreeable with the Towns, then use LOG funds. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she feels the first option would be that this is an impact of the <br />landfill operation. The argument could be used as indicated by the attorneys. <br />Geof Gledhill said that according to all the scientific information they have been able to gather, <br />the landfill operation is not responsible for the water problems in the area surrounding the landfill. <br />There was a consensus to use the one cent sales tax as the primary source to pay for <br />community benefits and use LOG funds as the second option. <br />ATTACHMENTS 7, 8 and 9 - INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT <br />Chair Brown feels we need to review the interlocal agreement before we talk further with the <br />Towns and the Board agreed that we should continue discussions with the Town of Chapel Hill on the <br />"Interlocal Agreement" as presented in attachment 7 of the agenda packet. <br />ATTACHMENTS 10 AND 11 <br />Commissioner Carey feels that it is important to get an indirect cost study done and that LOG funds <br />should be used to pay for this study. <br />Chair Brown said that the LOG is against this study and does not want to pay for it. She asked about <br />moving personnel from the Town to the County and if staff had thought about a facility for this personnel. <br />John Link said that this issue will need to be thoroughly discussed because some of the landfill staff is <br />housed in facilities owned by the Town of Chapel Hill. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she thought all assets of the LOG would be transferred to the County <br />if they took over the operation of solid waste for Orange County. <br />Gayle Wilson said that the current staff is housed in a facility paid for by the LOG. The facility is <br />located on public works property owned by the Town of Chapel Hill. <br />The Board agreed that the date the County will take over operations would be October 1, 1999. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to page 5 of the overheads which listed organizational <br />considerations if the County takes the lead role. She asked Personnel Director Elaine Holmes how she <br />determined substantially equivalent for employee pay and benefits and she said that they looked at the job <br />description of each employee and duties and responsibilities and how that would fall on our salary schedule <br />They reduced each benefit to a dollar value and the difference would be an adjustment to their salary. The <br />benefits would not be identical to those that they are now receiving from the Town of Chapel Hill, but their <br />salary would be adjusted by the difference in benefits. <br />John Link said that they would not be pursuing layoffs. He perceives that the functions will change <br />and what they want to do is to assure folks that they will be trained and reassigned.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.