Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-24-2011 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 03-24-2011
>
Agenda - 03-24-2011 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 4:28:59 PM
Creation date
3/21/2011 12:19:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/24/2011
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-24-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f ~~t ~~°t ~•~' ca~ ~+~ 3 2 <br />Memorandum <br />To: Board of County Commissioners <br />From: Jan Sassaman, Chair <br />Solid Waste Advisory Board <br />Subject: SWAB Interlocal Agreement and Alternative Technology <br />Framework/Timeline Recommendation <br />Date: November 11, 2010 <br />The Solid Waste Advisory Board (SWAB) has been discussing issues concerning the <br />future of the Interlocal Agreement (IA) as well as a possible response to the Alternative <br />Technology Timeline and framework request made by the BOCC in item 4 of its motion, <br />adopted December 2009, to utilize the City of Durham transfer station as a disposal site <br />when the Orange County-owned landfill ceases to accept waste. <br />At the SWAB's November 2010 meeting, general consensus was reached on a number of <br />points that are presented below. These issues will probably be further discussed at the <br />December SWAB meeting. In addition, the SWAB has identified those elements that we <br />believe should be incorporated/included in any new Interlocal Agreement for Solid Waste <br />Management for Orange County. . <br />Key Points from SWAB <br />Discussions on revising the current IA should proceed at a higher political and <br />managerial level than the SWAB. We believe that a group of representatives <br />from the four jurisdictions should be formed immediately to begin active <br />discussions on the political and functional possibility of a future partnership for <br />local solid waste management. These discussions could even consider the notion <br />of a public solid waste authority. The SWAB feels strongly that the <br />organizational issue and what the governments will do with their waste during and <br />following a possible 3-5 year interim period following landfill closure are <br />inextricably related and need to be addressed with all due haste. <br />The governing bodies should move deliberately as the 3-5 year period will pass <br />very quickly and a goal of not only deciding what to do and how to do it, but of <br />actually implementing a solution, would be in our mutual best economic and <br />environmental interests. In fact, with staff continually endeavoring to extend the <br />life of the landfill, a timely organizational and operational resolution could avoid <br />or at least limit the interim option and related expense of hauling to the City of <br />Durham. In other words, the process for post-Durham transfer station waste <br />management should begin immediately, along with the organizational discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.