Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-03-2011 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 03-03-2011
>
Agenda - 03-03-2011 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 10:51:48 AM
Creation date
2/25/2011 2:07:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-03-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
27 <br />KIPS Form 10 -WO-a OMB No. 10240018 <br />() <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />National Park Service <br />NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES <br />CONTINUATION SHEET <br />Section t# Page 11 Murohev School <br />name of property <br />orange County. NC <br />county and state <br />The standardization of the design and furnishing of new school buildings during the 19205 and <br />1930s became increasingly more common. Chief considerations in determining the general plan <br />were orientation, natural light and ventilation, flexibility for future additions, aesthetic fitness, and <br />economy. Other new standards for buildings recommended statewide were steam heat, indoor <br />plumbing, drinking fountains, and an auditorium that could double as a gymnasium and also host <br />community gatherings. 10 These standards of the new rural school would make it successful and <br />help to unify rural areas. <br />In addition to novel standards for consolidated school buildings, North Carolina educational <br />leaders called for higher standards for teachers, preferring those with some kind of professional <br />training. As of 1925, in Grange County approximately half of all teachers only held elementary <br />certificates 11 Proponents of consolidation claimed that with multiple schools combined together, a <br />surplus of teachers would be created, with only the best-trained chosen for positions in the new <br />consolidated school. In 1938 North Carolina required at least one teacher per grade with a "Class <br />A" certification in order for a school to be accredited. Educators also believed that teachers in rural <br />consolidated schools needed to integrate more into the community, and with few options in the <br />country for boarding, many school districts constructed teachers' homes or "teacherages" for the <br />purpose of housing rural teachers. Educational scholars claimed that not only would the <br />teacherage allow for teachers to develop relationships with community members, but it would also <br />provide social fellowship for single female teachers by living with their co-workers; the teacherage <br />becoming, "a self - evident necessity and a good investment for the distriet"12 <br />The superintendent of Orange County schools at the time of the construction of Murphey School <br />was Robert Claytor, who served a total of thirty years in the position and led the consolidation of <br />schools in the county. Orange County applied for $50,000 of the $5,000,000 of the State School <br />Fund for the purpose of erecting new schoolhouses during the early 1920s. Half the cost of each <br />new school was to be paid for by local tax districts in Orange County. The county also hired the <br />Henri C. Linthicum, of the architectural firm Linthicum and Linthicum of Durham, to draw plans for <br />new school buildings throughout Orange County. This father and son team, led by Hill C. <br />Linthicum until his death in 1919, promoted their firm as specializing in the design of educational <br />facilities. <br />10 Handbook for Elementary and Secondary Schools, 9936, publication no. 206 (Raleigh: State Superintendent <br />of Public Instruction, Prepared by Division of Instructional Service), p.13 -25. <br />t Andrews, Nita. "A Study of the Public Schools of Orange County," Masters Thesis, (Chapel Hill: University of <br />North Carolina, 1925), p. 70 <br />12 Arp, iulius Semhard. Rural Education and the Consolidated Schoa (New York: world Book Company, <br />1920), p. 151 -155. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.