Orange County NC Website
Commissioner Gordon asked what houses would be getting service. Barry Jacobs said it would <br />address those lots which have failing systems and which also would be considered developable lots. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis suggested that Board members walk this area to see the problems that <br />exist in this area. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Carey to receive this <br />report and approve the Administration's recommendation as stated below: <br />1) Address inconsistencies in County ordinances and policies as related to public water and <br />sewer extensions; <br />2) Determine what triggers the necessity of public water and sewer service to areas outside of <br />Transition Areas; <br />3) Reaffirm that only Orange County Environmental Health is empowered by the Board of <br />Commissioners to determine what triggers the necessity of public water and sewer to areas outside of <br />Transition Areas; and <br />4) Reaffirm empowerment of Environmental Health as described in 3) above to the Water and <br />Sewer Service Area Task Force, OWASA, and other jurisdictions. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Commissioner Gordon asked that items 2, 3 and 4 listed above be spelled out in detail. <br />b. Work Session -- Employee Compensation Items <br />This item was deferred from the Oct. 30 work session, which was devoted to solid waste issues. <br />The board discussed employee compensation issues and considered providing direction to staff as <br />appropriate. <br />Personnel Director Elaine Holmes explained the information in the agenda. <br />With reference to Career Growth Recognition Awards, Commissioner Gordon said she would like <br />to take this amount of money and use it to reward high performance as opposed to career growth recognition <br />awards. She would like this money to be used to encourage high performance. She would also like to see <br />what might be done about employees who perform at a relatively low level. <br />Commissioner Carey expressed concern with dealing with compression of salaries. He would <br />not like for one group of employees to be treated differently from another group. <br />John Link explained that compression could be handled by moving employees, who are <br />performing at a high level, up faster on the salary scale from the first step to middle of the range and moving <br />them up slower on the salary range after they reach the middle point or a designated point in the range. It <br />would take higher levels of performance to move up from there forward. <br />Commissioner Carey feels it is an equity issue when a new person progresses faster because <br />they are on the lower end than a person on the higher end who performs at a higher performance level who <br />does not receive an equal increase. <br />Chair Crowther feels that those performing at high levels should be rewarded and the reminder of <br />the money could be used to address compression. He does not understand rewarding employees for just <br />doing their job. <br />Commissioner Brown said that she is interested in pursing the Living Wage Ordinance. She <br />would like to talk about the technology positions and maybe outsourcing some of the positions that we may <br />only need for three or four years. She wonders if some jobs can be handled with contracted positions. She <br />asked for additional information on outsourcing. <br />There was a consensus of the Board to not allocate any additional money for the pay plan.