Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-03-2011 - 4a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 03-03-2011
>
Agenda - 03-03-2011 - 4a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2011 12:36:44 PM
Creation date
2/25/2011 12:36:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-03-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />8 <br /> <br />"...may not require a special use permit. However, for towers 150 feet in height or less, being <br />included on the MTP Map means that the towers are approved administratively rather than <br />requiring a Class B Special Use Permit." <br />Commissioner Gordon pointed out that she wanted the public to be aware of how to <br />apply for telecommunication towers. She also thought it was important that people knew that if <br />the site was on the map, if it was aCounty-owned site, then it could be approved <br />administratively rather than requiring a Class B Special Use Permit. She also pointed out that <br />when this public hearing agenda was approved, there were 14 sites and now there are 10 sites. <br />Planning Director Craig Benedict went over the agenda items for the QPH. He made <br />reference to the question about the map and whether the property owners of sites on the map <br />had any special rights. Any land that the County owns, even if it is not on the MTP map, does <br />not have to go through a special use permit. The map is posted on the website and if property <br />owners call the Planning Department, then they can find out how to get on the Master <br />Telecommunication Plan map in the future. There were 14 sites originally, and there was <br />discussion about the sites and the staff decided to pick three sectors -Little River Township, <br />Cedar Grove Township, and Bingham Township. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked how many of these sites were public. Craig Benedict <br />said that the fire stations -White Cross, Eno, Caldwell, and Cedar Grove -are public sites. <br />OWASA is considered a public site also. The Future Northeast Park, Walnut Grove Solid <br />Waste Center, Cedar Grove Park, and the County soccer fields are County-owned sites. <br />Occoneechee Mountain is also County-owned. There is a private site in the southeast corner of <br />the County that serves an important public safety purpose because there is a void in that area. <br />Commissioner Jacobs thanked the staff for switching the bulls eye from Little River <br />Park to the fire department. This site would serve the County equally as well. He said that the <br />wording is less preemptive than what it was previously, and he appreciates this. He is still not <br />sure it communicates adequately what is going on, but he will wait until the public hearing to <br />address this. He said that he spoke with Craig Benedict today about this regarding the County <br />being subject to the same standards as the private developers. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Foushee to <br />ask staff to bring to the public hearing criteria which the County would apply to its own sites <br />regarding things like the balloon test, public notice to adjacent property owners, siting <br />limitations, etc., so that it can be part of a record that people see at the public hearing. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Frank Clifton said that this is fine. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked if the ordinance says that the public sites have to go <br />through the balloon test and Craig Benedict said no. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon that any of the sites on this list have to <br />go through the same public hearing, balloon test, and other criteria. <br />There was no second. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.