Minutes - 19971022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

was a surprise to the Board of Commissioners. Orange County does not have the legal responsibility to manage solid waste for the entire County nor is the County ready to do so at this time. This is a land use planning issue and each entity has their own land use issues. This is a very difficult task and all jurisdictions need to persuade their citizens to change their behavior with respect to solid waste and also to pay for it. Cooperation is essential. Mayor Waldorf stated that it was essential that decisions be made. In 2005 the landfill will be at capacity. It will take years to get anything in place, including the MRF. She does not understand why more time is needed to decide on this. If The County isn't going to work with them, or take this over, Chapel Hill may have to make its own decisions. Alderman Zaffron stated that after having agreed to a procedure, people are now changing their minds. He felt that the reasons being given do not actually impact on what is in the Interlocal Agreement. He asked that the elected officials take a second look at their current positions on this issue. Chair Crowther stated that the County Attorney has made certain recommendations. He has stated that if the County were to have jurisdiction of managing everyone's solid waste, it would have to be responsible for siting a disposal facility with no veto power on the part of the other jurisdictions. The Greene Tract is also an issue for the County. If Orange County took over the landfill it would need to have responsibility for the future of the Greene Tract. Orange County considers the Greene Tract an asset of the landfill. Commissioner Halkiotis asked the other elected officials if they wouldn't also have serious reservations if they were considering taking over the management of the landfill. He commented that Council member Chilton said that the operations would "largely be in the hands of the Board of Commissioners". The word "largely" puts fear into the hearts of the Commissioners. In the last three weeks he has gotten different perspectives and answers about the reserve funds. He, and the other Commissioners, need a clear picture of the funds. He asked if the reserve fund is being used to pay for recycling? He also needs a commitment that the Greene Tract would be an asset of the landfill. Council member Chilton asked that the Board of Commissions keep in mind that the Town of Chapel Hill owns 43% of the landfill fund, including property and other assets. They would be agreeing to give that away which is also a big commitment on their part. Giving all of this to Orange county has the potential to make him nervous as well. Also, Chapel Hill would be agreeing to be a customer of huge proportions. Alderman Gist stated that she had been under the impression that there was agreement on these issues. Clearly that is not so. She suggested moving ahead with the discussion of community benefits. She asked that the Work Group meet again and report back to the Assembly of Governments in February of 1998. Attorney Jessup stated that if the County feels that it needs more information then one thing that could be done would be to get mutual agreements on when that information would be received and reviewed. Then the December date could be replaced with another date. He asked that everyone keep in mind that the feedback loop has an impact on everyone's desires and willingness to agree on this process. EUBANKS ROAD LANDFILL COMMUNITY BENEFITS (DECISION ITEMS) Chair Crowther introduced this matter. He indicated that all three Boards had to agree on an Item in order for it to be adopted. A majority of each Board would need to vote in the affirmative in order for the item to pass. It was decided to discuss and vote on each of the items listed as Exhibit C of "How the Remaining Pieces Fit Together" starting with Item Fourteen (xiv) and then work backwards. This information is located in the October 1997 Hazen and Sawyer report and is incorporated herein by reference as Attachment I. ITEM FOURTEEN (xiv): This item reads as follows: The Working Group recommends that three residents of the area near the Eubanks Road landfill (two in the Rogers Road area, an one in the Millhouse Road area) be identified to receive all mailings and information sent to members of the