Browse
Search
Minutes - 19970825
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Minutes - 19970825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2013 9:13:32 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:32:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/1997
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 08-25-1997
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - C3a(1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - C3b(1&2)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - E1a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - E1b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - E1c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - E1d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - E2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 08-25-1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Halkiotis requested that projected enrollment figures be rechecked as <br />those figures are probably low. He asked that the new enrollment figures be included here. <br />Commissioner Gordon agreed with Commissioner Halkiotis' comments and suggestion. <br />She mentioned that it is clear that development often costs the County more than it produces in <br />revenues. <br />County Attorney Gledhill mentioned that the County would obtain a deed for the stub-outs <br />and would hold that deed until the stub-out is completed. He indicated that it was possible but very <br />unlikely that the buyer would not be aware that a road could be cut through their property. <br />Planner Kirk pointed out that the main difference between the conventional and <br />conservation options was the inclusion of open space in the conservation option. <br />Commissioner Brown suggested that the open space plan be reevaluated to determine <br />what criteria developers use in making their final decisions regarding which option to choose. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis, to <br />approve the Preliminary Plan for Mill Pointe Subdivision per the Planning Board recommendation. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />c) NCDOT's Public Involvement Process for Improvements to Homestead Road <br />This item was presented by Transportation Planner Slade McCalip for the purpose of <br />considering information that may change the design and construction schedule of planned improvements <br />to Homestead Road. The proposed improvements programmed in the 1998-2004 State Transportation <br />Improvement Program include widening the road to a three lane facility with four foot paved shoulders to <br />accommodate bicycles. On June 25, 1997 NC DOT held an informational meeting at the Chapel Hill <br />Town Council Chambers for elected officials concerning planned improvements to Homestead Road. At <br />the meeting NC DOT staff proposed four different cross-section designs for Homestead Road. As the <br />meeting progressed, it became apparent that there were three main issues of concern to local officials. <br />These included: 1) the adequacy of the proposed capacity improvements for moving vehicles (i.e., are <br />five lanes needed now instead of three), 2) whether or not sidewalks would be provided, and 3) whether <br />or not bicycle facilities would be included in the proposed improvements. If additional lanes, curb and <br />gutter, etc. are requested, then construction will be delayed until additional funding for such <br />improvements can be secured. Also, DOT requires that local governments partially fund approximately <br />30% of new sidewalk construction. Because this road is physically located outside the city limits of the <br />Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and because NC DOT does not maintain sidewalks, a local <br />government would have to agree to accept and maintain the newly constructed sidewalks. The option <br />that is currently funded is Option #3 which includes 112 of a three lane road having 14' wide lanes (for <br />bicycles) with a sidewalk on the same side with a 4' paved shoulder on the opposite lane (for bicycles) <br />with no sidewalk (the intent of this design type is to provide a sidewalk on one side of the road and also <br />to prepare for the eventual need to widen the road to five lanes with the widening occurring only on the <br />side of the road which has the paved shoulder). <br />County Manager Link indicated that the turn lane that the Town of Chapel Hill is requiring <br />at the entrance to the new County facility will be fully explained at the next Board of Commissioners <br />meeting. This turn lane will be required regardless of which design option is chosen for the road. <br />Commissioner Gordon suggested referring this information to the Town of Chapel Hill to <br />coordinate the project request with them and to determine if they wish to include sidewalks in this project. <br />Their agreement would be necessary as they would be required to maintain the sidewalks.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.