Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 10:48:23 AM
Creation date
2/21/2011 10:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-28-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
[.*III <br />FYI <br />---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- <br />From: Betsy Smith <betsys @nc.rr.com> <br />Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:27:57 -0500 <br />Subject: Unified Development Ordinance:please slow down! <br />To: bjacobs @co.orange.nc.us, bpelissier @co.orange.nc.us, <br />gordon.alice @gmail.com, mikenelsonnc @aol.com, Vfoushee @co.orange:nc.us, <br />phemminger @bellsouth.net, syuhasz @co.orange.nc.us <br />Dear Board members - I just recently learned of the proposed Unified <br />Development Ordinance at a recent CH Town Council meeting and I am very <br />concerned. This proposed effort to simplify the development process <br />for the sake of improving economic development on first glance appears <br />to favor developers over the concerns of residents and the ordinance <br />itself appears to be fast - tracked with little opportunity for public <br />input or even any attempt to make the proposed changes clear to those <br />who would be most affected by it. Thus I would urge you to postpone <br />the vote on the UDO, extend the timeline to something that is more <br />reasonable given the scope of the changes (and the size of the <br />document!), and make a sincere effort to engage the public in <br />discussions of how development should proceed within Orange County and <br />if we should use this new proposed process. <br />We all know that development simply for the sake of economic reasons is <br />unsustainable and often leads to unintended consequences with <br />associated unplanned for costs. <br />thank you, <br />Betsy Smith <br />1412 US Hwy 15/501 <br />Orange County <br />PLANNING STAFF RESPONSE: Additional time provided through BOCC revised <br />timetable, including the continuation of the November 22, 2010 Public Hearing. <br />From: info @preserveruralorange.org [mai Ito: info@preserveruralorange.org] <br />Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 2:52 PM <br />To: Valerie Foushee; Mike Nelson (External); Alice Gordon (External); Pam Hemminger <br />(External); Barry Jacobs; Bernadette Pelissier; Steve Yuhasz; Frank Clifton <br />Cc: Donna Baker <br />Subject: UDO request from Preserve Rural Orange <br />To the Orange County Commissioners, <br />With regard to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to be reviewed at tonight's <br />Board of County Commissioners quarterly meeting, Preserve Rural Orange requests <br />that you extend the UDO decision - making process to ensure that citizens understand <br />the proposed changes and have opportunities to respond after the meeting and <br />before changes are adopted. In particular, we are concerned with new language on <br />conditional zoning which appears to allow for increased development without the <br />protection of the special use permit application process used previously for planned <br />developments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.