Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 10:48:23 AM
Creation date
2/21/2011 10:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-28-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
47 <br />Additional UDO Text Modifications <br />Below is a brief summation of proposed changes to the text of the current UDO Public <br />Hearing Draft. Following this summary are the actual text changes, in order, with <br />modifications shown in purple. <br />• Section 2.9.1 Conditional Use Districts- Additional text was added as Subsection <br />2.9.1(A)(4) to clarify a slight modification made to the Table of Permitted Uses - -- <br />Economic Development Districts. In the current Zoning Ordinance, which <br />includes the EDD Design Manual, certain uses within the EDD required approval <br />as a Class A SUP as well as a PD. As PD is no longer included within the <br />proposed UDO, a change was made to the referenced table that shows approval <br />of those uses must now be as a Conditional Use District (CUD). The modification <br />to Section 2.9.1(A)(4) addresses that proposed change. <br />• Section 2.9.2 Conditional Zoning District — After further review of the UDO Public <br />Hearing Draft, staff determined there was an inconsistency with the text in this <br />section and the submittal requirements for the MPD -CZ. The MPD -CZ requires <br />the submittal of a Master Plan, while all other CZs require the submittal of a site <br />plan, prepared in accordance with Section 2.5. The proposed modifications <br />correct the conflict. <br />• Section 6.2.11.D Calculations of building spacing requirements — The <br />modifications to this section include the addition of the correct references to the <br />new, correct graphic that will be added as Figure 6.2.11.D. In addition, the text <br />associated with the current incorrect graphic shall be deleted. <br />• Section 6.5.1.0 Design Standards — The modifications to this section include the <br />addition of the correct references to the new, correct graphic that will be added <br />as Figure 6.5.1.C.2. In addition, another correct graphic will be added to this <br />section (Figure 6.5.1.C.5) and the text associated with the current incorrect <br />graphic in this location shall be deleted. <br />• Section 6.14.8 Peak Runoff Volume — The only change to this section is a minor <br />formatting change to subsection 6.14.8(B) with the addition of a subset (2) which <br />is comprised entirely of existing text already within the subsection. This text was <br />formatted incorrectly in the UDO Public Hearing Draft. <br />• Section 7.7.4(B) Lot Standards — An incorrect reference was deleted in <br />subsection (5). <br />• Section 7.8.5(D)(8) Intersection with Public Roads — This is a minor text <br />modification to be consistent with the new correct graphic to be inserted into this <br />section. The required flare at the intersection must be 20 feet versus the 25 feet <br />currently noted in the UDO Public Hearing Draft. <br />• Article 10, Definition for 'Lot, Regular'— The modification to this definition is the <br />deletion of the incorrect references to the old graphic which will no longer be <br />included in the UDO document. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.