Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

N CD 6.12.6 page 6 -103 C) I hope that if a restaurant or other business wanted to have some fancy moving sign that fit the theme of the General Topic Comment restaurant that there could be a variance process for getting it. 2.6.5 Page iii, TOC Why only (E) when similar subsections are listed elsewhere (i.e. 2.9.1 (A) -(K) Cl) D) This restriction makes no sense. Electronically configurable signs can be of benefit to businesses. There is no Legends citing deleted text 34 pg 1 -16; 39 pg 1 -17; 126 pg 2 -57; 398 pg 5 -26; 399 pg 5 -27; 401 pg 5 -29; 414 pg 5 -37; 432 pg 5-44; 436 pg 5-45; 458 pg 5 -66; 489 pg 5 -100; 492 pg 5 -101; 493 pg 5 -103; 495 -498 pg 5 -104; 509 pg 5 -109; 513 pg 5 -122; 514 pg 5 -114; 610 pg 6-44; 611 pg 645; 614 pg 6-46; 677 pg 6 -129; 720 pg 6 -185; 736 pg 7 -3; 769 & 770 pg 7 -77 intent given here. Perhaps what really wants to be prohibited are electronic signs that change their content more Citing 6 -8 When citing 6 -8 (pg 5 -27 & elsewhere), it would help to offer granularity, like 6.8.6 in this case. often than (say) once every 5 minutes or so? Note that under the ordinance, a gas station could not have an electronic display of their cost per gallon. Article, Section, or Page Number (1) Would this prohibit the signs that are used in front of churches and fire departments when they have various events? I 11, 3 (2) pg 2 -55 Cross out "from its" to read: "appealed is transitory" think it makes more sense to ban portable signs that are used at a site for more than 30 days. 5.3.2 (A) (1) pg 5 -5 "models, plans and the like" ...and the like should be changed to more professional language. J Again, can someone get a permit for a special event that would allow this? 1 6.12.12 page 6 -110 (6) Should this be one wall sign per business establishment? If you had multiple businesses in a single building, as 2.1 pg 6 -1 Previously discuss LDS in Chapel Hill & Carrboro. In 6.2.1 "with the dimensional regulations of this Ordinance.....: Which ordinance? Isn't clear. Perhaps it could read "... regulations of this [County] Ordinance......" written this would be a problem. 1 6.12.12 page 6 -111 (2) This makes no sense. Why is the planning director involved? How about "Only businesses with drive through services are allowed to have drive through signs". And yes, that is silly enough that this entire entry should be removed. 1 6.12.13 page 6 -114 (3) (a) (i) How about one free standing ID sign per road frontage? If the facility was on a corner, you'd want to be able to see the sign from either road. Similar idea to 6.12.14 page 6 -118 B 1 (a). Comments submitted by: General Comments General Topic Comment 2.6.5 Page iii, TOC Why only (E) when similar subsections are listed elsewhere (i.e. 2.9.1 (A) -(K) 1 Legends citing deleted text 34 pg 1 -16; 39 pg 1 -17; 126 pg 2 -57; 398 pg 5 -26; 399 pg 5 -27; 401 pg 5 -29; 414 pg 5 -37; 432 pg 5-44; 436 pg 5-45; 458 pg 5 -66; 489 pg 5 -100; 492 pg 5 -101; 493 pg 5 -103; 495 -498 pg 5 -104; 509 pg 5 -109; 513 pg 5 -122; 514 pg 5 -114; 610 pg 6-44; 611 pg 645; 614 pg 6-46; 677 pg 6 -129; 720 pg 6 -185; 736 pg 7 -3; 769 & 770 pg 7 -77 Citing 6 -8 When citing 6 -8 (pg 5 -27 & elsewhere), it would help to offer granularity, like 6.8.6 in this case. 1 Article, Section, or Page Number 11, 3 (2) pg 2 -55 Cross out "from its" to read: "appealed is transitory" 5.3.2 (A) (1) pg 5 -5 "models, plans and the like" ...and the like should be changed to more professional language. 1 5.8.1(5) pg 5 -63 Can we site 6.8.6 here? 1 2.1 pg 6 -1 Previously discuss LDS in Chapel Hill & Carrboro. In 6.2.1 "with the dimensional regulations of this Ordinance.....: Which ordinance? Isn't clear. Perhaps it could read "... regulations of this [County] Ordinance......" 1) Incorporated; 2) For further BOCC discussion; 3) Implementation Bridge — Possible future phases; 4) Suggesting no action