Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 10:48:23 AM
Creation date
2/21/2011 10:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-28-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Staff Notes of Board of County Commissioners Comments -- First Draft UD®, Aug. 11, 2010 <br />1) Incorporated; 2) For further BOCC discussion; 3) Implementation Bridge — Possible future phases; 4) Suggesting no action 1018/2010 <br />Cn <br />to <br />Received <br />Section <br />Comment Received <br />Staff Note <br />112. <br />9/17/2010 <br />6.16.2E <br />Add except "approved" as MPD -CZ. <br />1 <br />113. <br />9/17/2010 <br />6.16.3 (B) <br />Add a description of what would be covered in an Environmental <br />Assessment. <br />1 <br />114. <br />9/17/2010 <br />6.19.5 (B ) <br />Unclear and preference for original language. <br />1 <br />115. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.1.1 A 6 <br />Correct typos: "Ensure" and "are" safe. <br />1 <br />116. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.2.2 <br />If an existing subdivision were expanded, would the first four lots <br />count towards the threshold? <br />4 <br />117. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.4.2 (A) (7) <br />Praised use of "low- impact" terminology. Check throughout doc for <br />consistency. <br />1 <br />118. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.4.6 <br />Check use of apostrophes and consistency. <br />1 <br />119. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.5 <br />Need process to amend a development agreement. <br />4, Now <br />called <br />"Subdivision <br />Agreement" <br />120. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.5 (C) (3) <br />Rather than provide examples, list the specific environmental features <br />that should be required. Add "cultural features" to the list. <br />1 <br />121. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.6.3 F (2 ) (a <br />Delete "man- made" and replace with "cultural ". <br />1 <br />122. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.8.2 <br />Public roads need to be laid out in a manner that avoids significant <br />natural and cultural features. <br />2 <br />123. <br />9/1712010 <br />7.8.4 <br />Need to revisit private road standards. <br />3 <br />124. <br />9/1712010 <br />7.1 <br />There's a lack of land use criteria for reserving school sites. Need <br />some general guidelines (i.e. not in wetlands or on slopes greater <br />than X). Consult County School Joint Construction Standards. <br />3 <br />125. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.11.5 <br />How is open space counted in a subdivision? How about one that <br />includes a golf course? <br />4 <br />126. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.12.1 <br />Is "Generally" the best word to use? <br />4 <br />127. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.13.3 B 2 <br />Add "connectivity". <br />1 <br />128. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.13.3 C 1 <br />Relation to adjacent properties is not addressed. <br />3 <br />129. <br />9/17/2010 <br />7.13.3 (C) (2) (g) <br />50 -feet is mentioned here but thought 30 -feet was mentioned <br />elsewhere. Check for any discrepancy. <br />4, None <br />found <br />1) Incorporated; 2) For further BOCC discussion; 3) Implementation Bridge — Possible future phases; 4) Suggesting no action 1018/2010 <br />Cn <br />to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.