Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 10:48:23 AM
Creation date
2/21/2011 10:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-28-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Staff Notes of Board of County Commissioners Comments -- First Draft UDO, Aug. 11, 2010 4 0 <br />1) Incorporated; 2) For further BOCC discussion; 3) Implementation Bridge — Possible future phases; 4) Suggesting no action 10/8/2010 <br />Received <br />Section <br />Comment Received <br />Staff Note <br />55. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.15.3 (F) (7) <br />Installation of utilities requirement basically says, "that's tough" to the <br />developer. Attempt to clarify this section with current edits doesn't <br />work. <br />1 <br />56. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.17 <br />Need a process other than that of a major subdivision for recombining 2, See Issue <br />existing lots. Paper - Att. <br />6 <br />57. <br />8/23/2010 <br />3 <br />Charts in this Article need to reference where Floor Area Ratio <br />4 <br />requirements can be found. <br />58. <br />8/23/2010 <br />3.3 <br />Need language that will differentiate between the different types of <br />3 <br />residential zoning districts. <br />59. <br />8/23/2010 <br />3.4 <br />For EC -5 (p.3 -28) and El (p.3 -40) Districts, if businesses were <br />4, Handled <br />"missed" when these Districts were applied in the County and they <br />on case -by- <br />continue to operate as commercial or industrial non - conforming uses, <br />case basis <br />said properties should be re- zoned. <br />60. <br />8/23/2010 <br />Livability is spelled wrong. <br />1 <br />61. <br />8/23/2010 <br />3.7.1 <br />Prefer use of term "General Standards" over "Generally, here and <br />throughout. <br />4 <br />62. <br />8/2312010 <br />4.2.3 <br />Change "residual (sludge)" to "biosolid ". <br />1 <br />63. <br />8/23/2010 <br />4.2.5 <br />Regarding Impervious Surface Ratios and Sliding Scales, the two <br />tables should be combined into one. Need to understand <br />ramifications of any proposed changes. <br />3 <br />64. <br />8/23/2010 <br />4.2.7 (B) (2) (d) <br />"attorney -at -law, licensed to practice law in the State of NC" should be <br />sufficient. <br />1 <br />65. <br />8/2312010 <br />5.1.4 (E) <br />Could (1) -(30) be reordered? Are research facilities excluded? "Land <br />Fills" should be one word. Spelling of theatres? <br />1 <br />66. <br />8/23/2010 <br />5.4.3 <br />"site Ian" or "plot plan", need consistency. <br />1 <br />67. <br />8/23/2010 <br />5.4.5 <br />Request for an example of a Building for Temporary Ilse. <br />NIA <br />68. <br />8/23/2010 <br />5.5.3 <br />Some home occupations are permitted but not associated storage? <br />This needs clarification. 1 <br />3 <br />1) Incorporated; 2) For further BOCC discussion; 3) Implementation Bridge — Possible future phases; 4) Suggesting no action 10/8/2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.