Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
N <br />Planning Staff Notes of Board of County Commissioners Comments -- First Draft UDO, Aug. 11, 2010 2 ccoo <br />1) Incorporated; 2) For further BOCC discussion; 3) Implementation Bridge — Possible future phases; 4) Suggesting no action 10/8/2010 <br />Received <br />Section <br />Comment Received <br />Staff Note <br />16. <br />8/23/2010 <br />1.8.4 (A) <br />Change "Chairperson" and "Vice Chairperson" to Chair and Vice- <br />Chair here and throughout. <br />1 <br />17. <br />8/23/2010 <br />1.10.2 (F ) <br />Change to "...as required by this Ordinance ". <br />1 <br />18. <br />8/23/2010 <br />1.10.2 (M) <br />How are floodplain regulations addressed within the new UDO? What <br />does the LOMA process require? Should this type of map <br />amendment be treated like others? <br />4, See Issue <br />Paper - Att. <br />6 <br />19. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.2.1 (A) <br />Submitted by the landowner "as identified by the Orange County Tax <br />Office "... <br />1 <br />20. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.2.4 (A) <br />Remove one of the references to "specific" there is redundancy. How <br />many copies of the application are required by Ordinance? If not here, <br />reference where standards can be found elsewhere in the UDO. <br />1 <br />21. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.2.5 A <br />Delete the word "through". <br />1 <br />22. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.2.5 C) 8 <br />Add Oran e- Alamance Water System OAWS <br />1 <br />23. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.2.6 C <br />If the application is not acted "upon" within this time frame,... <br />1 <br />24. <br />8/2312010 <br />2.2.7 C <br />Why treat withdrawal of an application as denial? 2 <br />25. <br />8123/2010 <br />2.2.8 (A) <br />Shouldn't have to wait a year if withdrawn. 6- months for withdrawal 2 <br />and 1 -year for denial? Can staff provide two options here for the <br />BOCC to select one? <br />26. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.3.5 <br />Change "Public Hearing" to "Quarterly Public Hearing" here and <br />throw hout. <br />1 <br />27. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.3.6 <br />Where we have electronic means to notify the public, we should add. <br />3 <br />28. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.3.8 B 1 <br />Define "fully dimensioned ". <br />4 <br />29. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.4.1 <br />Consider "deconstruction" vs. demolition <br />1 <br />30. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.4.3 (A) (4 -6) <br />Add "proposed" driveway, "proposed" septic, and "proposed" well. <br />1 <br />31. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.5.1 <br />"DAC" should be spelled out. <br />1 <br />32. <br />8/23/2010 <br />2.5.2 <br />Should be an "appropriately licensed professional ". It's not up to the <br />County to determine who is appropriate. <br />1 <br />1) Incorporated; 2) For further BOCC discussion; 3) Implementation Bridge — Possible future phases; 4) Suggesting no action 10/8/2010 <br />