Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 10:48:23 AM
Creation date
2/21/2011 10:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-28-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
202 <br />DRAFT <br />305 May Becker: It's also more targeted toward the bigger... <br />306 <br />307 Mark Marcoplos: But that doesn't cut nut smaller ventures at all. I think if you're worried about vacant lots and possibly vacant <br />308 office space that is not something we can really control. If somebody makes that decision and they get caught in the <br />309 circumstance of not being able to rent that office space, the County really can't control that and shouldn't be trying to control that. <br />310 If you start out with a piece of land and you look at the water features and the land and you protect those that you decide need <br />311 protection and you provide infrastructure and then you make people meet all the regulations, I think we've done what we can do. <br />312 <br />313 May Becker: I think that's reasonable to say as you point out that it's not the responsibility of the government or the county to <br />314 see to that somebody occupies the office buildings that are built. On the other hand, these are targeted areas and it seems that <br />315 the County and the government and the decisions that we make here are that you encourage one type versus another type of <br />316 development or you encourage something. If you zone something to encourage large parcels of offices to be developed, I think <br />317 its a reasonable question to ask, do we think that there is a demand for that? In other words, yo►i do go to other parts of the <br />318 country and you see large office parks and they look really nice and then years later they're empty. Since we are talking about <br />319 targeted areas, since we are talking about development and what type is healthy for the .... <br />320 <br />321 Mark Marcoplos: Isn't it true that you could specify several conditional uses. You can specify different uses, you don't have to <br />322 say I am going to build a homogenous office here and an homogenous office there, you can say I am going to build this here, I'm <br />323 going to build a daycare here or whatever. You have options. If you are smart about it, you would be diverse in your approach. <br />324 They can always sell the land, right? They're not bound to this decision in perpetuity. <br />325 <br />326 Craig Benedict: One additional concept that you're talking about is one small five acre developer can usually not afford the <br />327 offsite costs to connect their site to offsite utilities. So that small entrepreneur that wants to come in and he has an idea of what <br />328 he wants to put on three or four acres, its difficult for them but if somebody prepares an office park and handles some of those <br />329 master plan offsite turn lanes, traffic signals, and things like that then the smaller business entrepreneur has the opportunity to <br />330 move into that site on somewhat of a pre - organized and almost prepaid site. They may have to pay a premium but they don't <br />331 have to pay the entire premium that would be shared among multiple parcels. Again, that's a development pattern that we think <br />332 will encourage small business as well as the flexibility to have a large business. This definitely helps the smaller business <br />333 entrepreneur because its shared costs with some larger projects. <br />334 <br />335 Mark Marcoplos: I believe it's also true that the Commissioners can make a legislative decision outside of the parameters of this <br />336 and have some input beyond the actual UDO, they can add.... <br />337 <br />338 Craig Benedict: Yes, during the rezoning process they can listen to the public, and it doesn't have to be with a super strong <br />339 evidentiary standard when they're making a legislative decision. They can listen to the neighborhood and things like that. <br />340 <br />341 Pete Hallenbeck: In general I'm comfortable with the process that has been outlined as far as leaving certain parts of a <br />342 development open -ended for later. I think flexibility is good. I agree with a lot of what Craig just said. A bigger developer can <br />343 come in and actually put roads that are better. There's a risk there that you lose control of the development. It shouldn't be too <br />344 surprising that anywhere you have risk you have a benefit and the benefit is that you can get somebody that can do an office <br />345 park right which a smaller developer might not be able to do. Whenever you do the next step or the next phase of the office park <br />346 is done it is still subject to the same regulations and still subject to influence from the master plan. As far as empty office space <br />347 goes, I think when that happens its a matter of the economy a lot of the time. I think sometimes you also have some bad <br />348 building design that happens. Somebody throws up some office space, it is done poorly, so when people are looking at where <br />349 they want to go they don't want to stay in it. Its a buyer's market. If you're careful when you are approving the process and do <br />350 things like make the parking lot look nice and the building look nice, there are things you can do to keep an office park from <br />351 looking like a clunker. Finally, I also think a lot of time you get empty office space because the development is not diverse <br />352 enough. I know I looked for office space once in Chapel Hill and it was all Class A, I would love to be able to make enough <br />353 money to sit in a Class A office but Class B is where you're going to have the start up businesses where things are going to <br />354 happen. Again, that is something that could be controlled during this zoning process to keep someone from coming in and trying <br />355 to go in, for example, Efland and build 20 acres of Class A office space only to find that things change and it's overbuilt. The <br />356 other reason I think that's important is a topic I will touch on when we get to phase two but I am always struck by how much <br />357 attention is being paid to water quality, infrastructure for businesses, and then in Northern Orange County its a bit of a digital <br />358 ghetto. There are just no bits there and if you put a big office space in Efland somebody is going to have to bring in some very <br />359 high speed data to get the kind of businesses you want. It's more likely to happen if you can entice a larger developer to come <br />360 in, let him work in stages, to adapt to the economy but still have control of that process through these regulations. I think <br />361 everything we're talking about in all these zoning issues, has a Board of County Commissioners approval so it's not like once you <br />362 give approval for something, it's out of your control forever. Each stage will still have to get approved, the overall plan will have <br />363 to be approved. <br />364 <br />365 Larry Wright: Any other comments? Ok, what I'd like to do is go around to each of the Board members and have you state your <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.