Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011
>
Agenda - 02-28-2011 - C.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 10:48:23 AM
Creation date
2/21/2011 10:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-28-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
190 <br />Approved 2/2/11 <br />539 <br />540 Alan Campbell: If you moved 13 to D and then D crosses back over in 6.13.6b requires that the erosion control supervisor <br />541 approve it. <br />542 <br />543 May Becker: If a use is permitted, it sounds as if it is permitted if I mitigate whereas if you say permitted if, that it sounds like it is <br />544 unconditionally permitted. You are not unconditionally permitted to do it unless you fulfill the obligations and approval. <br />545 <br />546 Alan Campbell: There is a standard that says for uses permitted with mitigation, this is the extra step you have to do. It says if <br />547 you are going to do anything in 6.13.6, you have to do everything in A and B. <br />548 <br />549 May Becker. But it also reads that you are permitted to do it and you have to everything in A and B but .... <br />550 <br />551 Michael Harvey: But we would still have to approve it. <br />552 <br />553 Alan Campbell: B is the approval, you have to do everything in A which is frankly not anything special by B you have to get <br />554 approval. <br />555 <br />556 Perdita Holtz: But A3 does require approval of a site plan if you have a structure and we had talked about some sort of other <br />557 approval mechanism if there is not a structure. <br />558 <br />559 Alan Campbell: I am saying for the issue of everything in here in addition to whatever else it may require, it also it has a <br />560 mechanism. <br />561 <br />562 May Becker: To me it says, mitigation shall be provided in accordance with these standards and shall be approved kind of <br />563 implies that it shall be approved it is not saying it might not be approved. <br />564 <br />565 Mark Marcoplos: I think we are at a point where the changes are good and it is protected. I can tell you as a builder, I have <br />566 made great arguments to building inspectors and I have been absolutely right some of the times and not all those times was 1 <br />567 allowed to continue on with my right to complete that house. In the end, if they are there inspecting, they will make a judgment. <br />568 <br />569 May Becker: I would feel more comfortable if it did not say it was there right. <br />570 <br />571 Pete Hallenbeck: It is there no matter what. <br />572 <br />573 Brian Crawford: Are there any others? I think we can suggest some changes and suggestions. Outside of the new stormwater <br />574 management clause, are there any other issues that we need to address. <br />575 <br />576 May Becker: Sewer lines. <br />577 <br />578 Brian Crawford: What about sewer lines? <br />579 <br />580 May Becker. Again, clear cutting to get to them, maintenance of them, if they will be too close to the stream buffer, why are they <br />581 necessary for the stream buffer. I am not really clear again on permitted by right. What is stopping the nutrients from getting into <br />582 the water body if you are moving some trees to put sewer lines. <br />583 <br />584 Alan Campbell: Are these the sewer lines that would be put in by eminent domain, to put them where they want to anyway? <br />585 This is probably a technical correction to make sure they don't create a technical violation. <br />586 <br />587 Craig Benedict: That is correct. These are serving the public interest. Public water and sewer lines and streams where, in North <br />588 Carolina, sewer outfalls parallel streams because they all run down hill by gravity. They don't put them in the streams, they cross <br />589 the streams, sometimes they are up the back. They parallel many streams, that is how a gravity public sewer system is and that <br />590 there is a right that people have to develop their property in designated areas of public water and sewer and we are allowing that <br />591 right for someone to develop public water and sewer. <br />592 <br />593 Brian Crawford: That is more of a clarification than allowing because there is really nothing you can do if someone developed <br />594 property and you have a utility and someone comes in to put an easement within the allowable lot, I think the state will allow that. <br />595 1 think you can clarify to say what that distance needs to be. <br />596 <br />597 May Becker: Yes but we are talking about new sewer lines. If somebody already has something tagged so we are adding new <br />598 sewer lines to areas that ... have trees, or whatever. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.