Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-22-2011 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-22-2011
>
Agenda - 02-22-2011 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2011 8:51:58 AM
Creation date
2/21/2011 8:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/22/2011
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-22-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br />• <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner <br />Hemminger to approve adopting option B-City of Durham Transfer Station: <br />(1) Authorize the County manager to proceed with validating an interlocal agreement <br />between Orange County and the City of Durham formalizing future arrangements as an <br />intermediate solution (3-S years). Staff should seek in such discussions to assure to the <br />Brea#est extent possible Orange County's continued leadership in reducing solid waste <br />and promoting recycling. <br />(2) Direct County Managemen# to begin working with the towns on amending the 1999 <br />Interlocal Agreemen# as necessary with regard to the County obligation to provide solid <br />waste disposal facilities and formalizing waste stream flow commitments so that any <br />agreement with the City of Durham provides the towns and county with tha best rate <br />possible over the course of a long term agreement. <br />(3) Reengage the towns as full, proactive participants in the Inter-t_ocal Agreement and <br />in solid waste planning, and determine what they are willing to support, knowing <br />already wha# they oppose. <br />(4} Direct County staff and the Solid Waste Advisory Board to establish a discrete <br />timeline and framework for a public process to evaluate alternative methods for solid <br />waste disposal, with an emphasis on strategies that are environmentally sensitive, • <br />socially responsible, cost-effective, and multi jurisdictional across county lines. Said <br />framework for evaluation to return to the Board na sooner than September 2010. <br />(5} No additional funding for consultants to pursue these matters shall be authorized <br />without explicit direction from the Board: <br />A friendly amendment was made by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by <br />Commissioner Hemminger: <br />(6) To exclude the Millhouse Road -Rogers Road-Eubanks Road communiftes from <br />any future solid waste facilities. <br />Commissioner Jacobs and Commissioner Hemminger agreed wifh the friendly <br />amendment. <br />VOTE: Ayes, 6; Nay, 1 <br />December 7, 2009 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.