Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-22-2011 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-22-2011
>
Agenda - 02-22-2011 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2011 8:51:58 AM
Creation date
2/21/2011 8:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/22/2011
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-22-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />• Authorizes no funding for consultants to pursue these matters without specific approval <br />of the BOCC, and • <br />• Excludes the Miphouse Road-Rogers Road-Eubanks Road communities from future <br />waste facilities. <br />The most practical consequence of the motion was that. there was no transfer station site <br />selected. A report is provided (attachment 2) that discusses the status of the various topics and <br />issues. included in the adopted motion. The Solid Waste Advisory Board is currently discussing <br />a recommendation with regard to the framework and timeline for evaluation of technological <br />alternatives to landfilfing. At its October 73 meeting the SWAB endorsed a preliminary se# of <br />recommendations to the BOCC with regard to a new Interiocal Agreement for Solid Was#e <br />Management that will be further refined and finalized as soon as possible. <br />Solid Waste Convenience Centers <br />Considerable BOCC, SWAB, Work Group and public discussion has taken place over the past <br />eighteen plus months with regard to the future of Solid Waste Convenience Centers (SWCC} in <br />Orange County. These discussions included the general role, design, operation, hours, location <br />and financing of these centers and were originally prompted by proposed budget reductions. <br />The Work Group has spent considerable time and effort examining various SWCC <br />improvements and financing alternatives and has received and considered substantial public <br />input. Both the Manager and Commissioners have indicated the importance of determining a <br />Fong-term function and form of these facilities. <br />The Work Group's adopted recommendation is provided in a report (attachment 3). There was • <br />Work Group consensus that the SWCCs are a core County service and that the existing <br />configuration and financing structure was not likely sustainable for the long-term. Generally the <br />Work Group recommendation includes: <br />• A Total of five sites (existing} and the potential for a future sixth site off of Hwy. 57 <br />• A District/Neighborhood model whereby 2 centralized district sites are full <br />service%xtended hour (possibly 6/days week and/or unfit 7pm) facilities and the 3 <br />neighborhood sites are basic service/limited hour (4 days/week and/or until 7pm) <br />facilities <br />• Stationary compactors replacing large numbers of front-loading containers that <br />significantly improve the efficiency of hauling and create additional space for waste <br />reduction activities <br />• Site improvements such as paving, storm water management and improved loading <br />heights that improve safety, minimize site maintenance, odors and vectors <br />• improved signage and education program <br />• Expanded recycling and waste reduction opportunities at district sites such as resid <br />ti <br />l <br />en <br />a <br />food waste, fluorescent lamps, textiles, cooking oil, and enhanced salvagelexchange <br />opportunities <br />• Implementation of a household fee similar to or incorporated into the 3-R Fee, possibly <br />in conjunction with a user fee for bulky or smap commercial loads; the primary objective <br />is to reduce or eliminate reliance on the General Fund <br />• A phased implementation, beginning with the northern tier (Walnut Grove and High <br />Rock) <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.