Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-22-2011 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-22-2011
>
Agenda - 02-22-2011 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2011 8:51:58 AM
Creation date
2/21/2011 8:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/22/2011
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-22-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 . <br />o District Centers open six days/week, including Sunday afternoon <br />o Neighborhood Centers open four days/week <br />o Enabling very small commercial or institutional users to gain access to the site for • <br />a fee. <br />Funding: <br />o Implement 3-R Fee type annual household solid waste financing fee similar to or <br />incorporated with the existing 3-R fee (creating a potential `4-R Fee' funding <br />mechanism) <br />o Gradual reduction in general fund financing of Center operations <br />Phasing of Center Upgrades: <br />o Walnut Grove - FY 11/12 <br />o High, Rock - FY 12/13 <br />o Eubanks - FY 13/14 <br />o Ferguson - FY 14/15 <br />o Bradshaw - 15/16 <br />These recommendations also included estimated costs of improvements, phasing plan and <br />revenue options. At the November 2010 BOCC Work Session the Board provided guidance to <br />staff that was understood to include: <br />• If this recommendation is to go forward, an education plan would need to be developed <br />for the public, especially with regard to the annual household fee <br />• Prefer a tiered approach whereby the rural, urban and multi-family sectors are assessed <br />different amounts based roughly on anticipated sector usage <br />• Prefer a phased implementation approach for the annual fee that began at a lower <br />amount and escalated over time, but not with the objective of totally replacing general • <br />fund financing of the SWCCs in the foreseeable future <br />• Interest in expanding proposed hours of operation <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: There are no financial impacts with regard to receiving and discussing <br />the attached reports. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board provide further direction <br />or guidance to Staff with regard to the revised recommendations and instruct the Manager on <br />if/how the Board wishes to proceed with regard to incorporating these recommendations into <br />the Fiscal 2011/12 budget process. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.