Minutes - 19970417 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• In order for the landfill to be financially stable it must be a requirement that units of government use landfill. • No taxes will be levied for a landfill, however, there could be a fee for service to the towns which could come from the General Fund. • Reduction in the amount of solid waste going to the landfill will eventually cause increases in tipping fees because of a decrease in revenues. • Chapel Hill officials have a commitment to assuring that their constituents do not pay twice for solid waste disposal by paying for their own disposal as well as a portion of Orange County's. • The draft agreement indicated that the administrative costs of the system can be charged back to the system. • After adoption of the new plan, the benefits and liabilities will belong to the County. For example, if it is discovered, after the transfer that something illegal was occurring prior to the transfer, the towns will look first to the County to solve the problem. It would be possible at that time that the EPA would determine that all units of government continue to bear responsibility. • Operating the landfill would be the responsibility of the County. Each unit of government would be required to use the landfill. In response to a question, Bob Jessup, the attorney who is working with the L.O.G. indicated that if an environmental disaster was discovered to have existed prior to the transfer the County would be responsible for using system revenue only. If a problem needs to be fixed it would be possible to raise money or to finance and recover the debt service. EPA would also look to the parties who disposed of that waste in the landfill. He also pointed out that the agreement does not transfer the Greene Tract to the County, nor does it address the future of the Greene Tract. In response to a question regarding the cost of recycling Mr. Jessup indicated that Article 5.8 discusses Other Fees , how they would be raised, and what the procedure would be if the County recommended a change and the proposed Solid Waste Commission rejected that recommendation. The possibility of using a district tax was mentioned. It was also suggested that it is not appropriate to use an Interlocal Agreement to determine that General Tax Funds would not be used for collection in non-urban areas. That would be unnecessarily limiting the County. Geoff Gledhill indicated that an agreement that limits the county's ability to use tax revenue is not legally binding and should not be in this agreement. Commissioner Gordon requested clarification of section 7.02 Withdrawal of a Party. Mr. Jessup indicated that although a party could withdraw from the agreement, they would still be required to deliver their solid waste to the landfill. INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE PLAN: Councilmember Franck reported that the comments of each unit of government were received and reviewed. The solid waste staff has been charged with developing the framework of this plan. It will be presented to the Landfill Owners Group on May 8th for discussion and recommended changes. The approved draft will be presented at Public Hearing on May 22nd. On May 28th the