Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-15-2011 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-15-2011
>
Agenda - 02-15-2011 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2011 10:03:37 AM
Creation date
2/14/2011 10:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/15/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-15-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 2/2/ 11 <br />731 protective against these scary uses rather than the new processes would be more permissive. <br />732 <br />733 Rachel Hawkins: I think as Pete said if we show that it can be faster than it has been it would be an advantage because we have <br />734 a reputation in the state that we are the hardest people to get along with and we've got to make that........they say the same <br />735 thing in Chapel Hill but still I think we haven't said explicitly, like we have here tonight, it's not something hard. <br />736 <br />737 Larry Wright: I agree with Pete and Andrea. I would like to emphasize in this exclusion list, it looks like in those permitted tables, <br />738 it is too much is being given away which is not the case at all. It is very difficult to read through that. Use chart Craig created. <br />739 <br />740 May Becker. I am thinking from the discussion tonight, what we're talking about there, what I've been considering there also is <br />741 Samantha's original question about the person who wants to have a barber shop in his or her house and how that fits in mixed <br />742 use development and these types of zoning. How that might relate to sprawl versus being able to maintain a historic center, <br />743 walkable .... <br />744 <br />745 Samantha Cabe: After the discussion I realize I should have not asked that question because it is not relevant. <br />746 <br />747 May Becker. I think it's interesting too down the line if you create it where you do have people walking and people being able to <br />748 have the opportunity to have a business in their own home, how does that fit into the type of zoning. <br />749 <br />750 Judith Wegner: Two weeks is agreeable from now. <br />751 <br />752 Tommy McNeill: What is fascinating is staffs knowledge. I think we are all more educated because of the process tonight. <br />753 <br />754 Marc Marcoplos: I thought you and Michael would talk briefly about did they speed up the process and you said they didn't <br />755 necessarily speed up the process. <br />756 <br />757 Craig Benedict: That was the UDO Phase 2 to talk about what uses are in our EDD Conventional zones and how long does it <br />758 take to get through that. <br />759 <br />760 Marc Marcoplos: A couple people said we should tell the public that it speeds it up. I would be careful. <br />761 <br />762 <br />763 AGENDA ITEM 9: COMMITTEEIADVISORYGOARD REPORTS <br />764 a) Board of Adjustment <br />765 No Meeting. <br />766 b) Orange Unified Transportation <br />767 No Report <br />768 c) Efland-Mebane Small Area Plan Implementation Focus Group <br />769 No Meeting <br />770 <br />771 <br />772 AGENDA ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT <br />773 <br />774 MOTION: Alan Campbell made a motion to adjourn. Seconded by Larry Wright. <br />775 VOTE: Unanimous <br />776 <br />777 <br />778 <br />Brian Crawford, Chair <br />17 <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.