Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-15-2011 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-15-2011
>
Agenda - 02-15-2011 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2011 10:03:37 AM
Creation date
2/14/2011 10:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/15/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-15-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 2/2/11 <br />426 and one you don't. Let me go through Planned Development and Conditional Use Districts and page 22. This is in the existing <br />427 zoning code and I think there has been anxiety about this being something completely new. <br />428 <br />429 Samantha Cabe: One thing that make is seem new is that looking at the Table of Permitted Uses, you don't see a planned <br />430 development but there is the new Conditional Use zones. <br />431 <br />432 Shannon Bevy: The last three columns are CZDs not Conditional Use Districts, they are~Conditional Zoning Districts. <br />433 <br />434 Samantha Cabe: How does in a Conditional Use District, someone would apply for that like they would apply now for a planned <br />435 development? <br />436 <br />437 Craig Benedict: Correct. <br />438 <br />439 Samantha Cabe: Regardless of what their current property is zoned, it could be anything on that list? It is really not different at <br />440 all. <br />441 <br />442 Craig Benedict: It is not different at all. You can ask for PDs throughout the county. It is a legislative process that the <br />443 Commissioners can say it makes sense or not. We have been doing planning studies like the Efland Buckhom Mebane, the Eno <br />444 Economic Development District, in the Orange County Speedway area that says these areas may be more appropriate for more <br />445 intense growth and might be more opportunity for this creative flexible development. <br />446 <br />447 Lany Wright: I understand the Permitted Uses as they are on the table but I don't understand what is on page 5-4, Exclusions. <br />448 <br />449 Shannon Beny: If you would disregard the last three columns on the table when you talk about exclusions. The exclusions are <br />450 what you cannot ask for as far as Conditional Use District. <br />451 <br />452 Samantha Cabe: If I own a big tract of land zoned Rural Residential and I wanted to do a Southem Ullage, I would go through <br />453 the Conditional Use process and I could not ask for any of these things to include in my project? <br />454 <br />455 Shannon Berry: Yes. If you want a Conditional Use District but on the scale of Southem Ullage, you would probably go for the <br />456 MPD-CZ zoning district and rezone to that with the master plan concept because you would be phasing it. <br />457 <br />458 Samantha Cabe: I would do a mini Southem Village. That is why the master plan wasn't used very often because it was either <br />459 rezoned or not. <br />460 <br />461 Craig Benedict: If you have a specific project, you know what you are doing, you will be doing a CU. You are coming in with a <br />462 specific use or dance studio or karate studio. You can come in and ask for it and set your own standards, get it approved and a <br />463 site plan comes with it. <br />464 <br />465 Samantha Cabe: That would be like a strip mall. <br />466 <br />467 Shannon Berry: As far as the exclusions, on the list, they seem to be more intensive uses. The idea being that while you want to <br />468 have flexibility, these more intensive uses, you probably don't want someone to come in areas because they are very specific. <br />469 This give a little more leeway and approval work. <br />470 <br />471 Larry Wright: In terms of the next person who comes through there, we might want to think about putting something with the <br />472 exclusions listed. <br />473 <br />474 Shannon Berry: The footnote. <br />475 <br />476 Lany Wright: It is ambiguous forme. <br />477 <br />478 Shannon Berry: Excluded for a CU district. One difficulty is that the words are so similar. In the footnotes, it states CU district <br />479 but these are excluded from that old Planned Development stuff but not the new conditional use zoning. Anyone applying for this <br />480 will not do it alone. <br />481 <br />482 Larry Wright: If you think about these exclusions and somehow how to wrap it around and help the reader a little more. That <br />483. would be helpful <br />484 <br />485 May Becker: What is the standard for the planned development? Can the County Commissioners say they don't think it is a <br />486 good idea? <br />12 <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.