Minutes - 19960826 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

are opposed to rezoning the lots which were originally a part of Stage Coach Run. They do not have an opinion on the other lots. Geof Gledhill mentioned that if the lots are a part of the subdivision, the restrictions apply unless changed by the Homeowners Association. Arthur Cogswell, the project planner, stated that the density of development for these lots is not an issue for them. They have not formulated plan at this time, however, they intend to work with the community. They will be in communication when they do develop a plan. Mr. Charles Davis stated that the lots in question were originally sold to Center Point and were reclaimed by him when Center Point went bankrupt. He did not want to take them back but did not have a choice. The lots were eliminated from Center Points plan in the 1980s. The County Tax Maps do not show these lots as a part of Stage Coach Run. He also mentioned that the lots are not subdivided and are, in fact, one tract. Mary Willis stated that there was originally an area that extended to where those lots were platted. However, a large area was recombined and put back into one tract. A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, to refer this item to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than October 1, 1996. VOTE: UNANIMOUS 2. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments (a) Efland Setback Overlay District 1) Article 4.2.26 District Statements of Intent and Application Criteria 2) Article 6.24 Efland Setback Overlay District This item was presented by Mary Willis to consider the creation of a new Overlay Zoning District which would allow lesser setbacks than generally required in the underlying zoning district, and to apply the new Overlay district to Ten and Twenty-Year Transition Areas in the Efland Area. These proposed overlays would allow setbacks of 20 feet from road right-of-way and 8 feet from side and rear property lines, with provisions for zero- lotline development in the interior of a subdivision. The proposed setbacks are comparable to the setbacks currently allowed in the R-5 zoning districts. This item was presented along with Item 1.a. The motion was made in item La above as restated below. A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Crowther, to refer this item to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than October 1, 1996 VOTE: UNANIMOUS (b) Temporary Events 1) Article 8.8.14 Special Uses (Temporary Events) 2) Article 6.16.17 Additional Requirements for Certain Permitted Uses 3) Article 4.2 Permitted Use Table 4) Article 22 Article 22 Definitions This item was presented by Mary Willis to consider a citizen request to create a new use category called "Temporary Events" which would be allowed in residential districts with approval of a Special Use Permit. Examples of this kind of use are commercial craft shows, carnivals, festivals, concerts, medical or veterinary clinics, and outdoor social events hosted by a business such as a restaurant or caterer. Temporary events such as those described above would not be considered a principal use when they take place at a site normally associated with the activity. COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. Commissioner Gordon asked which residential districts were included in this request. Mary Willis indicated that all districts up to R-13. She indicated that this was being proposed for a Special Use Permit so that issues such as parking availability could be looked at for each request. Also, there would be a Public Hearing required for each request.