Minutes - 19960619 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

David Caldwell, a lifetime resident of the Rogers Road area, expressed a concern about 714 groundwater contamination and said that area residents were attempting to raise funds to pay the $20 per home fee for testing their well water. Roger Barr said that . if garbage were piled as proposed in the site consultant's report, it would be ..an aesthetic disaster given the level of bedrock and the height of area water tables. He asked that the officials seriously examine landfilling alternatives. Fred Brooks, a resident of Granville Road, said that although he did not live near any of the sites, he was concerned about the wisdom of the process to date. He feels that economics and technological alternatives needed to be thoroughly rethought and reexamined. Sally Crane said that she lives near the present landfill site. She asked that the officials consider alternative methods to landfilling including incineration. Betty Maultsby said that although she did not live near any of the proposed sites, it appeared that the process has been directed to the conclusion of siting the landfill at site seventeen. She said that VEDCO only guarantee that fifteen percent of recyclables would be recovered, a percentage which did not meet the State's standard. She feels that a landfill is needed to handle construction and debris and organic wastes. She urged local elected officials to have a full discussion concerning landfilling and other alternatives. William. Hutchins, a registered professional engineer and Orange County resident, said that the present landfill was well sited on a divide between two watersheds. He urged officials to be creative in reusing the existing landfill facility. Bonnie Norwood inquired whether the notice of the hearing had been intentionally placed near the obituary column in the newspaper. Commissioner Gordon inquired how far above ground level the peak of the landfill on site seventeen would be. Gail Wilson did not have the answer but reported back on July 1 the following information: 'They show the comparative height of the proposed design capacity of Orange County-17 at 690' vs the Phase I (existing North Eubanks Landfill finished elevation) and Phase 2 (proposed final elevation of the South Eubanks Landfill) heights. The height of Blackwood Mountain is 744' and the existing Eubanks Road elevation is 510'. He again would suggest that future waste reduction be used, not to significantly reduce the size/capacity of the new site, but to both extend the life well beyond the 50 year estimated capacity and to reduce the final elevations to well below the 690'." He said that it was also .important to note that existing height estimates for Orange County-17 is based on preliminary geotechnical information and will be further refined after further, more detailed geotechnical investigation after final site selection. Commissioner Willhoit said that the total projected height was for a period of fifty years. He suggested that a portion of the Landfill Fund be used to pay for testing for chemical contamination in groundwater wells near site seventeen. Council Member Evans noted that the present 202-acre landfill site had lasted for twenty-four years and that sites two, nine and eleven were over five hundred acres each. She asked why the four alternative sites were so much larger than the existing landfill. She also inquired whether or not a two hundred-acre site would be sufficient for a new landfill site if an aggressive recycling program were undertaken. Chapel Hill Solid Waste Director Gayle Wilson said that the Town's population and related growth rate had accelerated appreciably since the 1970's when the current landfill was sited. He stated that the Landfill Search Committee had focused its energies on sites comprising 500 to 600 acres each. Commissioner Willhoit said that the original charge was to identify alternative tracts of land comprised of 300 to 500 acres. Council Member Andresen inquired about the staffs response on the meeting notice requirements. Mr. Wilson said that notices of the hearing had been mailed to all residents living within one thousand feet of any of the four sites. Also, newspaper notices were published last week. Socioeconomic