Orange County NC Website
i. Authorize staff to notify the public of the November 22 public hearing continuation <br /> through email distribution lists, County website, press release, posted bulletin, and letter to <br /> municipalities (item, "ii" below). If the BOCC chooses to publish an additional legal <br /> advertisement in the newspapers, the BOCC will need to allocate an additional $3,000 to the <br /> Planning Department's advertising budget. <br /> ii. Direct the County Manager to send a letter to the four municipalities located in <br /> Orange County (Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Hillsborough, and Mebane) asking what form of UDO <br /> presentation is necessary and what dates in January 2011 are suggested if a formal <br /> presentation by County staff is requested. <br /> iii. Direct the Planning staff to hold a public outreach meeting on the UDO by the end <br /> of January 2011. <br /> iv. Direct that written comments on the proposed UDO from municipalities and advisory <br /> boards (other than the Planning Board) must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. on February <br /> 2, 2011 in order for the Planning board to consider the comment prior to making a <br /> recommendation to the BOCC. <br /> v. Continue the November 22, 2010 public hearing to February 28, 2011 (note: public <br /> hearing will be continued to April 5, 2011 at the February 28 hearing in order to receive the <br /> Planning Board's recommendation). <br /> vi. Direct the Planning board to complete its review and make its recommendation on <br /> adoption of the UDO in time for the April 5, 2011 BOCC meeting. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz made reference to the difficulty of the Planning Board having a <br /> meeting so soon after the public hearing. He asked if the public hearing could be moved to <br /> February 21st or the Planning Board meeting could be moved ahead a week. <br /> Craig Benedict said that the 28th is a regular QPH and on February 1, 2011 the BOCC <br /> would have to advertise for that public hearing. If it were moved earlier, by January 20th, the <br /> public hearing date and the proposed items would have to be decided upon. One <br /> recommendation was to have a public outreach in January to supplant the legal public hearing. <br /> Staff believes that they can do more one-on-one in a public outreach session and address <br /> issues directly with the people that are sending emails and asking questions. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked about the other option of having the Planning Board set <br /> their meeting on March 9th and Craig Benedict said that the Planning Board would have to <br /> address the comments from the public and have the minutes approved that night. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that his preference would be to have another public <br /> hearing, but not to bring it back to the Board of County Commissioners any later than April 5th <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that she thinks the Planning Board can work with this <br /> schedule. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that it is commendable that the Planning Board wants to do <br /> as much as possible in advance of the February 28th public hearing. He wants to support the <br /> motion and have the public hearing on February 28th. Regarding the outreach meetings, he <br /> said that he does not have confidence that these work as well as a public hearing because he <br /> has been to a few on the UDO where very few people attended. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> d. Permit Extension Act of 2009 <br /> The Board received the Planning Board and Board of Health recommendations on <br /> whether the County should formally opt out of provisions of the Permit Extension Act of 2009. <br /> Michael Harvey gave some background and summarized this item. This Act temporarily <br /> suspends local land use regulations that rescind previously issued development approval(s) <br />