Browse
Search
ORD-2011-005 (Not Approved) An Ordinance Defining and Regulating Peddling and Solicitation in Orange Co
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2010-2019
>
2011
>
ORD-2011-005 (Not Approved) An Ordinance Defining and Regulating Peddling and Solicitation in Orange Co
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2019 3:03:52 PM
Creation date
2/2/2011 12:14:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/1/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-01-2011 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 02-01-2011
Minutes 02-01-2011
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
os- ai_,�as� <br />a.'f.D - <br />'j, ~3°'` <br />Commissioner Yuhasz asked when Habitat would ask for the reimbursements and Robert <br />Reda said after the closings. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he would like to see an accounting of all of the bond <br />money that the County has spent. He was under the impression that the County had spent all of <br />the bond money. He asked if HOME funds could be used as impact fee reimbursements. <br />Tara Fikes said that they could be used for impact fees if it is done during the <br />construction phase. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he would like to refer this to the Affordable Housing <br />Advisory Board to discuss the options. <br />Tara Fikes said that the County did commit all of the bond money that was available, but <br />all of it has not been expended. The $130,000 has been made available because there was a <br />commitment to the Chrysalis Foundation, who has now gone out of business. <br />Chair Pelissier asked if there would be any other requests this fiscal year and Frank <br />Clifton said that Habitat would be closing on seven homes this fiscal year. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she remembers that the County has a policy to reimburse <br />impact fees. She thinks that Habitat and the others that come in would have an expectation that <br />the impact fees would be reimbursed. She would advocate for approval of this in full. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Foushee to <br />approve an impact fee reimbursement request from Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, NC. <br />Inc. for $72,239 for ten (10) homes recently constructed in the County, and then figure out <br />whether there should be a change in the policy going forward. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that as part of the development of the policy he would hope <br />that the Affordable Housing Advisory Board would be included. <br />Robert Reda said that Habitat has 31 families that have been approved for homes and all <br />of those families already reside in Orange County. There would not be a further impact on the <br />schools. <br />b. Peddlers and Solicitors Ordinance of Orange Countv <br />The Board considered an ordinance to regulate door to door offerings for sale and selling <br />of goods, wares, merchandise, food, periodicals and services and the solicitation of orders or the <br />solicitation of monetary contributions in residential areas of the county, and to promote the public <br />safety and welfare. <br />Willie Best introduced this item. In September, the County Commissioners requested a <br />draft ordinance and staff consulted with the Sheriff and the County Attorney. Only two counties <br />in the state have this sort of ordinance — Pasquotank and Catawba. Each of these counties has <br />had difficulties with the ordinance. <br />John Roberts said that the research on this is not complete and was only prepared as a <br />report item to seek input from the Board. He said that the County Commissioners should not <br />adopt this until there is further study. One concern is the fee structure. He also has concerns <br />with non - profits and thinks that they should be exempt altogether. <br />Frank Clifton said that certain properties could be posted that no soliciting was allowed <br />and this would still work. <br />John Roberts said that the County Commissioners received an email from Orange County <br />Voice and a couple of things are not true, but one suggestion from this group was illegal and that <br />is for towns to extend their ordinance permits to the County. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.