Orange County NC Website
areas would be proposed water and sewer areas, transit corridors, and within 3/4 mile of an interstate <br />corridor. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS <br />LEE RAFALOW, member of the Small Area Plan Work Group and several of the subcommittees, <br />thanked Planner Gene Bell and the Planning Staff for their help in this process. He said that the consensus <br />they have is based on their understanding of the Flexible Development options and the Rural Design <br />Guidelines. He noted that there were some last minute changes in the Flexible Development Plan that the <br />Small Area Planning Group have not considered in their recommendations. They tried to create a balance <br />wherein the benefits of density and the destruction of density were contained in the same area. <br />CURTIS BANE, member of the Small Area Plan Work Group, made comments about the University <br />Station area and the subdivisions which have been approved for that area. The homes will be priced from <br />$150,000 to $250,000 which is out of range for most young couples. He favors a water and sewer system <br />for the entire area. He wants the roads in the Stoney Creek basin to remain as they are now with these 600 <br />new homes using a newly designed thoroughfare that will access the main roads. He wants to maintain the <br />country flavor of the area. <br />MASCAR KAVORI noted he just purchased a house on Stagecoach Road as shown on the map <br />between the Economic Development District and the 1-85/NC86 Activity Node. He asked what industries <br />would be permitted in both areas and if the adjacent property owners will be informed that there may be <br />industry in that area. Gene Bell made reference to the Zoning Ordinance and the table of permitted uses. He <br />noted that safeguards and design guidelines have been built into the process, especially in terms of buffering <br />residential properties from different land uses that will be near them. He will give Mr. Kavori his phone <br />number so they can talk further about his specific situation. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Crowther, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to refer this <br />item to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of County Commissioners no <br />sooner than August 5, 1996. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />(b) CP-3-96 Buckhorn Road Economic Development District Expansion <br />(3b) Z-3-96 Buckhorn Road Economic Development District Expansion <br />(4d) Economic Development District Design Manual <br />Planner Mary Willis said that one goal of the Board of County Commissioners for 1995- <br />96 was to look at the possibility of expanding the Economic Development District at Buckhorn Road. The <br />existing district is on the north side of 1-85 and contains about 300 acres of land for primary development. <br />The area they looked at for proposed expansion is on the south side of 1-85 and bounded by Mt. Willing <br />Road, West Ten Road, Buckhorn Road and the Interstate. All property owners within the area and outside of <br />the area were invited to attend meetings to voice their concerns. Two of the concerns were the provision of <br />water and sewer for this area and a desire to maintain the neighborhood's existing residential character. <br />Other concerns are listed in the agenda. Mary Willis showed on a map the area being proposed for this <br />Economic Development District. Two developed areas would be excluded from the district and the buffer <br />would be expanded from 100 feet to 150 feet around these areas. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the reference to sewer disposal on page 65 of the agenda. <br />Mary Willis explained that Buckhorn Road forms the ridgeline as the boundary between the Haw Creek <br />Watershed and the Upper Eno. All of the drainage within the district is suitable to be included in the Efland <br />sewer system. Gravity flow could accommodate all the corridors leading to one pump station which would <br />pump up to Highway 70. <br />County Engineer Paul Thames said that it would be less expensive to just develop the <br />northern section and put in four or five pump stations. However, pump stations are mechanical and prone to <br />failure. The overall best design is to have one pump station with everything going to it by gravity. He noted <br />that they would hope to find industry with low water use. <br />In answer to a question from Commissioner Gordon about allowing residential development <br />while waiting for this area to develop, Mary Willis said that allowing residential development of any large tract <br />would defeat the purpose of the district.