Browse
Search
RES-2004-018 Resolution Regarding Orange County's 2004 Legislative Agenda
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Resolutions
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
RES-2004-018 Resolution Regarding Orange County's 2004 Legislative Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2011 4:01:33 PM
Creation date
1/31/2011 4:41:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/16/2004
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Resolution
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-16-2004-7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2004\Agenda - 03-16-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br />a permit with minimal or no review based upon the certified site evaluator's work and introduce <br />a method by which site evaluators can be held accountable for their decisions. <br />We do not have the same confidence that a certification committee would be successful in <br />taking appropriate action for errors, omissions, and bad actors, let alone making <br />accountability stick. -The same type of oversight exists for engineers, licensed soil scientists, <br />and certified operators, but the respective governing boards have been reluctant to take action <br />on their members. In particular, the North Carolina Board for the Licensing of Soil <br />Scientists already has the legal authority via NCGS ~89F-23 to seek injunctive relief against <br />those involved in soils work who are not legally licensed and, to our knowledge, they have <br />refused to take such action even when those persons are apparently in blatant and multiple <br />violations of the licensing act and operating in direct competition with their own membership. <br />Given this refusal to hold non-members accountable, we do not expect them to hold their own <br />members to any greater or even reasonable standards. <br />It is not clear, but could be assumed that Environmental Health Specialists employed by the <br />local health department would also have to become certified as site evaluators. Regardless, <br />we strive to keep our on-site wastewater staff here in Orange County on the leading edge of <br />technologies and evaluation practices in the field. While we are not opposed to elevating the <br />overall state of practice for local health department practitioners, it would pose another <br />requirement for continuing education and, in effect, be an unfunded mandate for counties to <br />absorb. <br />3) Require that all lands that are subject to local subdivision approval that do not have access to a <br />public sewer system must be evaluated by a licensed soil scientist prior to recordation with the <br />county register of deeds. Involving the soil scientist at the beginning of a proposed <br />development will assist the developer in making the most out of the proposed development <br />within the parameters of the soils available and will assist the local health department by <br />filtering out unsuitable properties from being proposed for development prior to the permit <br />application stage. <br />We have no objection to this element of the proposal. This is currently an option available to <br />developers proposing a subdivision and is commonly used on a voluntary basis. In Orange <br />County, a variation of this requirement already exists in the current subdivision ordinance. <br />There also needs to be a provision to address subdivisions that intend to use systems other <br />than on-site wastewater systems such as package treatment plants. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.