Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
99 <br />d` w <br />j, <br />~~~IA tat°~~~~ <br />Orange County <br />Department of Asset Management and Purchasing Services <br />ADDENDUM #1 <br />August 19, 2010 <br />To all Vendors: <br />Modifications to bid documents for the above named Request for Proposal are made as follows and shall <br />be included in the proposed amount. <br />Questions received, with answers <br />1. Do I interpret Section 2.7 Fees to mean, compensation based on recoveries only and not on any future <br />savings? A: Respondents can also propose future savings. It would be one of the items considered <br />during evaluation. Please clearly sped time periods and percentages. <br />2. We did receive a copy of the above noted RFP and it appears to be for refund/recovery only. Is the <br />County interested in cost savings going forward? If so, how would the County prefer the pricing <br />for that aspect? A: See #1 <br />3 What is the annuals nd on ever . If ossible list b . A: <br />Utilities FY 08-09 Providers <br />Electrici $552 167.03 Duke Ener Piedmont Electric <br />Natural Gas $230, 638.85 PSNC <br />Water $58, 233.77 Town of <br />Hrllsbor h OWASA ORANGE ALAMANCE <br />WATER SYSTEMINC <br />Pro ane $10 075.83 Carolane Pro ane <br />Fuel Oil $22, 841.00 Creedmore <br />4. How marry locations is the County having <br />audited? A: 46 locations <br />S. What companies are the primary utility providers? A: See #3 <br />6. Are there locations with 24/7 hours of operation? A: Yes, three. <br />Two E11tiS Substations and the 911 Center at the Meadowlands <br />7. Are Has another firm ever audited the County's bills? If so, what <br />were the results? A: Yes, Robert S. Segal, CPA PA in 2005 with <br />favorable results <br />All other temps and conditions shall remain the same. <br />8. Which utilities do you all <br />buyfrom?A: See #3 <br />9. I see that the scope shows refunds of overpayments -would you all interested in savings ideas going <br />forward as well? <br />A: See #1 <br />10. Since the look back is for 5 years worth of data, it looks 1~7ce you all may have done this exercise before - if <br />so, would it be possible for us to see the accepted bid of the company that did the audit? <br />A: See #7, bids were not solicited for the work <br />Page 18 of 19 <br />