Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-01-2011 - 6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 02-01-2011
>
Agenda - 02-01-2011 - 6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2011 9:40:15 AM
Creation date
1/28/2011 9:40:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/1/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Legislative Areas of Support 02-01-2011 - 6b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2011
Legislative Items of Interest - 02-01-2011-6b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2011
Minutes 02-01-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
RES-2011-008 Resolution Regarding Legislative Matters - Prohibit the Hunting of Deer with Dogs in Orange County
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-009 Resolution Regarding Legislative Matters - Pertaining to Alamance County-Orange County Line (91%) (9%)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-010 Resolution Regarding Legislative Matters - An Act to Repeal Title VII of Session Law 1987-460
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-011 Resolution Regarding Legislative Matters - Statewide Matters
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br />revenue generation is reduced, with the result that the tax burden is shifted from one local <br />constituency to another. <br />• The General Assembly should evaluate existing local revenue base exemptions and exclusions to <br />determine if they have achieved their intended tax policy objectives. New or extended <br />exemptions and exclusions should include a "sunset" date in their authorizing legislation. <br />• Local government tax revenues should not be earmarked for specific programs, functions or <br />services. <br />Financing Mandates <br />County officials recognize their responsibilities for carrying out policies formulated by the General <br />Assembly. State policy makers should recognize county revenue base limitations and variations in <br />revenue-producing capabilities among counties and should not mandate programs requiring county <br />financial participation. <br />The Association believes that mandated programs should be financed as follows: <br />• Where the state has mandated county financing in broad terms, permitting county discretion in <br />service levels, counties should have the primary financing responsibility. <br />• Where the General Assembly has set a minimum of basic service to be available equally to all <br />state residents, the state should have financing responsibility. County financial participation <br />should be limited to sharing the programs' administrative costs. <br />• Where the federal government has initiated services to provide income maintenance for all <br />citizens, the federal government should have financing responsibility. <br />Fiscal Integrity of Counties <br />Counties need timely information from the legislative and executive branches of state government <br />regarding budgetary decisions that affect county taxation, budgeting, and fiscal management. In order <br />to enhance the fiscal integrity of counties, the Association will continue to support improvements in <br />financial management practices and reduction of inconsistencies in fiscal procedures among programs <br />administered by county governments. <br />The Association believes that the continued fiscal health of county government depends upon the <br />following: <br />• State laws and guidance that provide for sound financial management practices that are <br />adaptable to the special needs of each county. <br />• Appropriate state agencies should guide necessary improvements in consistent accounting, <br />reporting and auditing procedures. <br />• State agencies monitoring county programs should not require practices that are redundant, <br />duplicative, or inconsistent with generally accepted principles of budgeting and accounting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.