Minutes 11-22-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

There have been many changes between the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) discussed earlier this fall and the final document brought to the November 22 Quarterly Public Hearing. In addition, this document was not available to the public until less than two weeks before the hearing. Furthermore, the Chapel Hill Town Council and Carrboro Board of Aldermen need a chance to review the UDO to ascertain how it applies to the areas covered by the Joint Planning Agreement. C. ADDITIONAL TIME FOR REVIEW Because of the proposed addition of floating zoning districts (Conditional Districts) which is a significant change to Orange County's current zoning ordinance, and the number of changes that were incorporated into the extremely large UDO document brought to this public hearing, the Commissioners should allow more time for the public, the towns, the Planning Board, and the BOCC itself to assess how the changes will impact all of us. AMG 11/22/2010 Second document: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE - KEY ARTICLES AND SECTIONS The Planning Board should review all articles in the UDO, and then vote on whether or not they recommend approval. I. KEY ARTICLES The following articles should be reviewed with special care. Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and related definitions in Article 10. II. KEY SECTIONS In addition, there are some key sections to be reviewed. They include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following sections. A. CONDITIONAL DISTRICTS Here are the sections (that I have identified so far) that cover Conditional Districts. There are also definitions in Article 10. Conditional Districts, Sec 2.9, pp. 2-38 through 2-46 Conditional Districts, Sec. 3.7, pp. 3-62 through 3-72 Conditional Uses, Sec. 5.1.4, pp. 5-3 through 5-5 Table of Permitted Uses, Sec. 5.2, beginning on p. 5-6 Additional Standards for MPD-CZD, Sec. 6.7. pp. 6-54 through 6-63