Browse
Search
Minutes 11-22-2010
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Minutes 11-22-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2016 2:13:47 PM
Creation date
1/24/2011 10:30:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/22/2010
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-22-2010 - Joint Mtg. - Planning Board - Early
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 11-22-2010 - Joint Mtg. - Planning Board - Early
Agenda - 11-22-2010 - Quarterly Public Hearing - Late
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 11-22-2010 - Quarterly Public Hearing - Late
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
all day. Directly across the street is the Go-Kart track and all the noise it makes. Just to the <br /> south of the property is Orange County Speedway. These 4 acres are not suitable for any type <br /> of residential use. I built a 4,000 square foot home on the site across the road from the <br /> concrete plant and I live there full-time, so I'm not going to do anything that's going to hurt the <br /> value. I want to put some mini-storage units on the 4 acre site beside the concrete company. <br /> I'm asking that the elected officials (Commissioners) sign into law the conditional use and the <br /> ordinance so residents like myself and others with property in the middle of the commercial area <br /> are allowed to do some type of commercial use. I remind the Commissioners that this is <br /> conditional use, not an outright commercial zone. So we will have to get permission before we <br /> do anything. As it stands now, we can't do anything, so please make this issue a priority, it's <br /> been long enough. <br /> Sincerely, Darrell W. Chandler" <br /> Allan Rosen said that he has been a County resident for 18 years and he has served on <br /> the Economic Development Commission. He said that there is no doubt that existing <br /> regulations have impeded commercial development, but they have also increased the cost of <br /> land, which has had an adverse affect on the cost of housing. He said that if the UDO is done <br /> well, it can improve both commercial development outcomes and hopefully residential <br /> development outcomes. He said that the Comprehensive Plan has never truly been <br /> implemented. He thinks that the County will be served well when it is implemented fully. He <br /> said that it is also critical that it be done as thoroughly as possible. He considers Phase II as <br /> more important. He said that the UDO is the one policy instrument that is substantially or wholly <br /> in control of the Board of County Commissioners. The County Commissioners can make its <br /> mark here and send a signal to the business community that Orange County is serious about <br /> welcoming business. <br /> Ben Haven from the Village Project read a prepared statement. <br /> "Since 2005, the Village Project has actively participated in Orange County's efforts to <br /> create the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, and we've continued to pay attention to related issues on <br /> the Commissioners' agenda. One of our foremost desires is that the Plan will clearly delineate <br /> where growth, redevelopment, and reinvestment can occur, especially those projects necessary <br /> to build and maintain a resilient, high-functioning business sector. The rules and regulations <br /> governing the development process in Orange County have as much influence on our built <br /> environment as any other factor controlled by County government. Hence, it is essential that <br /> the County's development regulations promote the development outcomes that are in the <br /> County's best interest, including economic development. <br /> The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) currently under consideration presents the <br /> County Commissioners with an opportunity to create a tool which can foster the economic <br /> development activity desired by the Commissioners and County citizens alike. Additionally, the <br /> UDO will be the central instrument for shaping the direction of all development for many years to <br /> come. As such, the Commissioners can use the UDO to not only achieve these outcomes, but <br /> also to affirm the County's desire for more vibrant economic activity. Perhaps most importantly, <br /> the UDO is one of the few policy tools regarding land use planning —and therefore economic <br /> development—that is nearly 100% at the discretion of the Commissioners. <br /> The Village Project agrees with the County Economic Development Commission which <br /> advised the Commissioners to "complete all phases of the Unified Development Ordinance <br /> effort within a timeframe that establishes confidence with developers, investors, and business <br /> owners and also results in a reduction in the time needed for a project to go from application to <br /> permit issuance and into construction." <br /> The Village Project especially recommends that the Commissioners task the planning <br /> department, in Phase II, to modify the existing rules and regulations such that the regulatory <br /> environment— at a minimum — compares favorably to neighboring jurisdictions. In other words, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.