Browse
Search
ORD-2005-202 - Child Day Care Facilities Zoning Ordinance Amendment
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2005
>
ORD-2005-202 - Child Day Care Facilities Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 11:48:52 AM
Creation date
1/19/2011 12:52:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/21/2005
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C.3.b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-21-2005-3b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 11-21-2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. Child Day Care Amendments G 3 • ,�j <br />Consideration of amendments to amend the child day care provisions of the Zoning <br />Ordinance to establish consistency with State standards and terminology for day <br />care providers, users of day care facilities, and the general public. <br />Glen Bowles presented this item. He said that these definitions were created back in the <br />1980's and have not evolved. The State's definitions have evolved and are continuing to <br />evolve. He showed a map of licensed facilities in the County. Several people have made <br />suggestions. Specifically, Lanier DeGrella, Technical Assistance Director of Child Care <br />Services Association wrote an email. He would like to make this email part of the record. He <br />said that most of the changes proposed have to do with definitions. The exceptions are on <br />page 8 and the proposed changes are in italics. He read the changes. A Family Day Care <br />Home would be one or two children. The next category is a Day Care Home with between 3 <br />and 12 children, which would be reviewed by staff with a site plan. If there were more than 12 <br />children, it would be a Day Care Facility and would require a Class B Special Use Permit. The <br />only real change is the definitions. The Planning Department has definitions that do not quite <br />fit. He said that they would welcome any opinions from the Board and others. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the letter from the Technical Assistance Director of <br />Child Care Services and said that she refers to an attached document, which was not included. <br />Glen Bowles said that the document was the ordinance and he has made the changes that she <br />pointed out. He will share these with the Board and the Planning Board. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she finds this unsettling and that they do not have the final <br />document that will be referred to the Planning Board. She is not able to make helpful <br />comments yet. <br />John Link said that the directors of these organizations need to sign off on this to make sure <br />these changes are what they expect. This would be Sue Russell, Director of Child Care <br />Services; Michelle Rivest, Director of Smart Start; and Nancy Coston, Director of Social <br />Services. He wants to make sure the language is correct and that it is a very straightforward <br />process. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to refer <br />the proposed amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation and returned no <br />sooner than January 24, 2006. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />D. ADJOURNMENT <br />With no further items to discuss, a motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, <br />seconded by Commissioner Gordon to adjourn the meeting at 9:36 p.m. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Moses Carey, Jr., Chair <br />Donna S. Baker <br />Clerk to the Board <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.