Browse
Search
Minutes 10-26-2010
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Minutes 10-26-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2016 2:18:12 PM
Creation date
12/9/2010 3:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/26/2010
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-26-2010 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 10-26-2010 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 10-26-2010 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 10-26-2010 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 10-26-2010 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 10-26-2010 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 10-26-2010 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 10-26-2010 - Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Foushee said that funding from governments should not be more than 35%of an <br /> agency's funding. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that if the purpose is to not make them dependent on <br /> County dollars, then they should not be dependent on County dollars. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs suggested getting some data on what percentage of the <br /> County's funding makes up the total budgets of these entities. <br /> Commissioner Hemminger suggested leaving the percentage at no more than 50%for <br /> now. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz suggested looking at a declining percentage. <br /> Chair Foushee said to use the target amount from last year's funding to start with as <br /> the total amount. <br /> The Board agreed. <br /> 4. Are there any other defining criteria the BOCC wants to assert for future Outside <br /> Agency selection and funding? <br /> Gwen Harvey said that this was a catch-all question. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the bullet at the top of page 12, "support that <br /> brokers a new partnership or collaboration with a County operating department," and said that <br /> this should be considered. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz made reference to the net value of County space and said that <br /> he does not believe the County should be giving free space to any outside agency. <br /> Frank Clifton said that he will be bringing back to the Board of County Commissioners <br /> the draft facility policy on November 18th. He said that some agencies use County space for <br /> free and this does not show up in the County budget. He is looking into these. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier agreed with not preserving overall funding. Regarding the <br /> partnerships, she would like this phrase put back in the first section without the dollar amounts. <br /> Chair Foushee reviewed what the Board had agreed upon: <br /> - The first three bullets on page 11 for#4 will be removed. <br /> - The first bullet on page 12 and the principal program statement will be incorporated <br /> in the first section. <br /> - Eliminate funding for agencies whose primary mission is not related to the social <br /> safety net. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs suggested some wording: "brokers of new partnership or <br /> collaboration of the County operating department, preferably related to support of social safety <br /> net." <br /> Chair Foushee asked about the"net value of facilities" and Frank Clifton said that he <br /> would categorize it and give a summary of what he finds and a best estimate of the value of <br /> those assets. <br /> 3. Review of the New Format for the County's Capital Investment Plan (CIP), <br /> Including Revisions to the Existing Capital Funding Policy and Dept Management Policy <br /> The Board reviewed proposed changes in format for the County's Capital Investment <br /> Plan, as well as changes in the Capital Funding Policy and Debt Management Policy included <br /> in the CIP. <br /> Michael Talbert from Financial Services said that this is the second look at this item and <br /> he reviewed the formatting for the CIP. Most of the numbers were not real numbers and were <br /> just there for illustration. He said that he forgot to add the Sportsplex Enterprise Fund and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.