Agenda - 12-06-2010 - 7c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

single integrated plan will be submitted by all the partners and a specific reaffirmation of the 61%waste reduction goal in the resolution from each government attached to each plan submittal. That goal or another goal will be adopted by all jurisdictions as part of the resolution with the current plan submittal. In 2005,the Board of County Commissioners established the Solid Waste Plan Work Group to further the specific objective of creating a more comprehensive solid waste plan. The Work Group, as it's known, consists of an elected representative from each jurisdiction, technical staff from each jurisdiction's Sanitation/Solid Waste Division and the total membership of the SWAB. An interim plan was sent forward from the Work Group in 2008 for the 2006 submittal and was adopted by all jurisdictions as the plan update. T'he Work Group has reviewed technical materials and delivers its opinion and recommendations on matters related to the reports referenced above. The Work Group may sunset in the fa112010 following review and input to the preparation of the 2010 solid waste management plan update. In 2008,the County adopted the Work Group recommendation, originally recommended by its technical consultant, Resource Recycling Systems,to switch to two-stream recycling(paper in one bin and cans and bottles in the second at all types of locations except dropoff sites)and by December 2008, all programs were converted to that collection mode from the six-way separation that had existed in one form or another since the inception of public recycling in 1987. This change created a much more efficient means of collection and enabled continued growth in the number of stops on rural curbside routes and commercial routes using existing staff and some new equipment to process and move material to market more efficiently. The equipment, including a leased road tractor,walking floor trailers and a rubber tire loader was capitalized from current budget allocations and capital reserves with no new funds needed. Over 150 new commercial stops and some new multifamily stops were added from the efficiency gains realized by converting to two-stream collection. Several small staff initiated program changes were made in congruence with the general approach of adding new recycling materials when markets arise, but they were not made in accordance with any particular planning dictate. Thus there is now a program to collect non- bottle#2 and#5 plastics at drop off sites, old media such as videotape is collected with electronics and newspaper and magazine collection were combined at the dropofF sites, because the paper buyers sell the combination of those two types of paper all to newsprint mills. Thus there was no price reduction, in fact pricing is maximized for this grade of material and hauling became more efficient. In prior years the Work Group had broadly reviewed the concept of building an in-County MRF, commercial recycling and waste management in the unincorporated azeas. In 2009, the Work Group's emphasis focused more sharply on waste and recycling management in unincorporated Orange County due partly to impending service reductions at convenience centers. Due to these increased fiscal and operational pressures,the main emphasis was on how to manage, improve and fmance the solid waste convenience centers along with a lesser emphasis on rural curbside waste collection and expanding and improving curbside recycling. The Work Group made no recommendations pertaining to either expansion of rural curbside recycling or implementation of franchised waste collection. Their lengthy and detailed deliberations on these issues reflect important differences of opinion in the group on how to proceed. There was ample public input as well on these points over the past two years. 42