Agenda - 12-06-2010 - 7c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

r St7Llt? WASTE iNQRIC GRtJUP S11�C+�RECQMNIENQAT1t3NS Znbte 7.•7-Year F.r�tslazse Frmd Flc�usehatd F�Re�uised for�Fnat Recommerrdution with C�erre�at�'unc155igpnrfPhased Oivaver 6-Y�E'�rfod ...,;.. ,,.,...... . :w;:,s, <°r�•'';•' : „� FY�1if'M2 F�!'2A!`,+J�� 13h# £'I'20A{J16 fit?QIti1B f�11!�7�7 �2t1t�148 �. ,; . . -..,d.... _., Fiat Foc F1ot�cc-nll Haiac#iotd� $'1:2 S'L' 43S S33 SA1 S41 $S9 Fiat Fee tit�rad Fce Kur� S:SS S.sS �59 $6J S�1 $72 $y7 nerec�ea-um3n #�r S7r �ze � Saz Saz �o r�s�Pe-na�ib��„�y ,� s� � s7 Sz s� s� The folfowing notes#1 throvgh#10 provide background on the line items and numbered note re#erences shawrt in the 7-Year Enterprise Fund forecast in both scenarios. L Operating costs that incorporate the savings projeded for the more efficient sites are showm,building from a base[ine direct cost structure in FY 2010 of$1,793,649 increased at 3% per year, pius the Sanitation Division's atlaation af emrironmenta[ services administrative charges(currently funded only by the Iandfil[and 3-R programsj to arrive at ihe$2,016,312 identified in the FY 2011/12 expense 3ine item in Table 4 and Table 6. 2. Capital debt retirement for the SWCC upgrades that is assumerJ to 6e the annuaEized amo€tization of rapital for the Neighborhood/District SWCC System financed over 10 years @ 59fi ($323,751j ptus amartizaiion for replacement of existing SWCC capita! {Sanitation Qivision rolling stock amortization estimated at$40,600J_ 3. The 3-R fee Contribution is pro-rated based on the portian of each SWCC site used for recycling_That has been fuced at$26I,�each year,thougFt it cauld increase based on the square footage at the SWCCs that's taken up by recycling ac[ivities induding woad,metal, ei�in addition to€he convent6onal recyclables. 4. The General Fund contribution is assumed to be eliminated effective year 1 in Table 4 and phased out over six years as shawn in Table 6. 5. The Proposed Hausehold Fee,discussed as part of an expanded 3-R Fee,is calculated based on required funds,shawn in Tables 5 and 7 as bath ftat fees across all parce[s or pra-rated in a tiered structure to tt►e different seetors as a function of frequenty of use_ 6. The Accaunt-Based Fees would come fro¢rs fees charged to small commerciat and institutional users ihat woutd now be allowed to use the larger District sites - with an assumption of 15,00�uses and a$10 net revenUS(over cosu}for each use of the senrice, Use is projected ta escalate Zil°rb per year as these small haulers learn how to use che site after the iandfiit closes and the�urham Transfer Station is the next nearest disposal site. 7_ The Nei SurplusjjDeficit)shows revenues minus costs for that year—indicating whether the Enterprise Fund has covered its abligations for that year or would need to draw on cumulatir+e Enterprise Fund reserves if a deficit is shov�rn_ 8. The Cumutative Net SurplusJ(Deficitj shaws any build up of reserve in ihe Enterprise Fund generated from the SWCC program,funds which serve as a contingency should a deficit resutt in any one year. 1Oj27/fQ OW1N6E COUNTY Sf?LID WASTE Page 7 af 8 120