Browse
Search
RES-2005-077 Resolution and Ordinance to Provide for Flood Damage Prevention in Orange County
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Resolutions
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
RES-2005-077 Resolution and Ordinance to Provide for Flood Damage Prevention in Orange County
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2012 9:38:52 AM
Creation date
12/1/2010 4:12:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/3/2005
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Resolution
Agenda Item
5q
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-03-2005-5q
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2005\Agenda - 10-03-2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
47 <br />Brian Dobyns: My understanding was that farm structures did not need a building permit. <br />Glenn Bowles: If this is a critical issue, perhaps we could do some type of outreach to notify the <br />farmers of the new regulations. <br />Renee Price-Saunders: On page 2 it defines an accessory structure, it lists structures and goes to <br />farms. This maybe too general, and you may want to be more specific. <br />Glenn Bowles: We can make some changes as long as we don't make it less exacting. <br />Renee Price-Saunders: We can make it more pertinent to rural areas. <br />Craufurd Goodwin: Was it a misprint that lumber was listed under chemical compounds? <br />Glenn Bowles: Lumber was on one of the original lists. Typically lumber is not a chemical <br />compound. <br />Jay Bryan: Treated lumber could be. <br />Glenn Bowles: There are a number of commodity storage units in the floodplain as well, so we <br />have to be careful how it's addressed. Especially with regard to junkyards. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: What is the basis that this will be released to the general public in a readable <br />fashion? Will there be a general notice in the paper? <br />Jay Bryan: Do you mean will there be an educational component after the ordinance is approved? <br />You may want to identify particular people that might be affected. <br />Glenn Bowles: We have already sent letters to two types of individuals affected by the change, <br />but did not address the third type of homeowners who will continue to be in the floodplain. We <br />have also run legal ads in the newspapers about the proposed regulation changes. <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: I have property in the floodplain and had I not been at this meeting, I probably <br />would not be aware of the changes. <br />Glenn Bowles: There are 3,228 parcels that have some land in the floodplain. Mass mailings <br />don't often generate interest either, but we could possibly use some other form. <br />Jay Bryan: You may want to identify a communication process. <br />Renee Price-Saunders: You could put it up in various County buildings. <br />Craufurd Goodwin: Are individuals prohibited from storing items (i.e., piles of gravel, cement <br />logs, bricks, etc.) that will disturb the natural flow of water)? <br />Brian Dobyns: Such as the use of temporary storage. <br />Glenn Bowles: There can be a new item to clarify this. <br />Renee Price-Saunders: One concern you mentioned is the concern of downstream flow, but when <br />the rivers swell, they go outward, not down or up. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.