Browse
Search
Minutes 09-23-2010
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Minutes 09-23-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2016 2:27:19 PM
Creation date
11/8/2010 9:57:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/23/2010
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-23-2010 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 09-23-2010 - Joint Mtg. - Schools
Agenda - 09-23-2010 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 09-23-2010 - Joint Mtg. - Schools
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
letters to the editor, etc. to help educate the public about this referendum. She pointed out a <br /> copy of what appeared in the Daily Tarheel. <br /> Frank Clifton said that the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce has endorsed <br /> this referendum. He said that staff is looking at printing out 100,000 handouts that will be <br /> placed in all County buildings. According to law the County can only educate the public about <br /> the issues, but elected officials can take a public stand, without using public funds. <br /> CHCCS Board Chair Mike Kelly said that the school board has already adopted a <br /> resolution in support of this referendum. He asked how the allocation would relate to the 48.1% <br /> that the school systems get now. <br /> Frank Clifton said that these funds are going to be tracked in a different fund and would <br /> not be part of the General Fund. <br /> Mike Kelly asked for more clarity on this issue. Frank Clifton said that the 48.1% would <br /> remain in the County's General Fund, but the 42.5% is specific sales tax revenue. <br /> Mike Kelly said that it is important for the public to understand that the total allocation <br /> available to the County that will be allocated to the schools will decrease slightly. <br /> Chair Foushee said that this is not necessarily a true statement if this is related to <br /> aggregate numbers. <br /> Frank Clifton said that he would hope that all elected officials in this County would speak <br /> to the public in a clear voice that this is an important opportunity for the future of Orange <br /> County. If the County is successful in economic development and the tax base expands, then <br /> schools and everyone else will benefit. In the end, the public needs to know that the elected <br /> officials of the County will do what is best for the County, schools, economic development, etc. <br /> These are tough economic times and they are going to be asking the public to tax themselves; <br /> but they need to stress moving forward in difficult times instead of how to slice a pie they have <br /> not even baked yet. <br /> Jamezetta Bedford asked how the funds would be divided between the two school <br /> systems from this tax and Chair Foushee said that the Board of County Commissioners have <br /> not had that discussion yet, but it would like to hear from the school systems on this issue. <br /> Jamezetta Bedford said that a per-pupil basis would be appropriate. <br /> Debbie Piscetelli said that she would appreciate a conversation with the Board of County <br /> Commissioners about this. She does not want the needs of the Orange County School system <br /> to go unnoticed. There was a referendum awhile back for OCS and it was voted down. She is <br /> not trying to discount the needs of the CHCCS, but there are many needs for the OCS. She <br /> would appreciate having a discussion about this. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that the County Commissioners have talked about this sales <br /> tax being identified to use for older schools. He suggested looking at how many students in <br /> both districts are in older schools and distribute the sales tax revenue from that. <br /> Mike Kelly asked how an older school would be defined. Commissioner Yuhasz said <br /> that this should be part of the discussion after the tax is approved. <br /> Michelle Brownstein said that it would be helpful if there is going to be a united voice, to <br /> flesh out what is going to happen in the beginning. One of the open ended things is what <br /> happens after five years in terms of the allocation. <br /> Chair Foushee said that the Board of County Commissioners did not determine how <br /> these funds would be spent after the initial five years. She said that part of their discussions <br /> about older schools included how the school districts identify the older schools and their needs <br /> as submitted through the CIP process. <br /> Frank Clifton read the resolution to the school boards. He said that the issue was to <br /> have the school boards and the County Commissioners concur on the needs and the school <br /> boards would bring projects forward. <br /> Mia Day Burroughs said that they need to look at the reality—early voting begins in <br /> three weeks, and this is a time to get past the history of both boards. She said that all of them <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.