Browse
Search
Minutes - 19930524
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1993
>
Minutes - 19930524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2017 1:59:11 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:14:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/24/1993
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - C 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - C 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - C 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - C 4a, 5a, 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - C 4b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - C 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - C 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - C 6c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
Agenda - 05-24-1993 - C 6d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1993\Agenda - 05-24-1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
339 <br /> able to discuss the opportunities for people to take management positions. <br /> Such a plan could include a discussion of how they intend to transport peopl. <br /> from places where the unemployed and underemployed worker lives to t1 <br /> economic development zones. (3) Set as a criteria for participation tha-L - <br /> businesses will be attracted that will use the services and resources of <br /> Orange County and the region. This will have a multiplier affect on orange <br /> County. A copy of Mr. Sipress' statement is in the Permanent Agenda File in <br /> the Clerk's office. <br /> LARRY BAKER made reference to the line that runs through some of the <br /> properties on Old NC10. This line was originally all the way down to the <br /> railroad track and he had supported not splitting the properties. He would <br /> like to see this entire area in the primary development area as originally <br /> proposed or at least under secondary development. He has a mobile home park <br /> on this seven acres. If this boundary stays as proposed half of his property <br /> will be under secondary development and half will be residential. Under the <br /> secondary development - guidelines, if he has a mobile home spot vacant more <br /> than 6 months, he cannot put another mobile home on that spot. Marvin Collins <br /> clarified that the mobile home park would be nonconforming and the whole park <br /> would have to be vacant for six months for this to affect him. <br /> R. ALEX ZAFFRON spoke in support of this project. He hopes that the <br /> need to plan for economic development in the county is not lost and that the <br /> basic fundamental idea of planning for economic development in an <br /> environmental and economically responsible way is continued and that this <br /> project does go forward. <br /> PATRICK CLAYTON stated that he and his family own eighty acres a <br /> interchange at I-40 and 86. The taxes for 1986 were $813 . The taxes for <br /> 1987 were $5, 755 and for 1992 they were $7,500. They support this going <br /> forward. They have received inquiries about this property. <br /> JIM HOWIE reinforced the concerns noted above by Commissioners Insko <br /> and Gordon. He feels they have not been fully informed in Cornwallis Hills <br /> about what is happening. He expressed a concern about the quality of life and <br /> his desire to keep it- like it is. He is for growth but. wou-ld like for it to <br /> be controlled within the plan itself. He asked - to have additional <br /> communication with all the parties affected and a meeting has been scheduled. <br /> He asked the Board to consider the quality of life when considering economic <br /> development districts. <br /> VIC KNIGHT stated that the Board of Realtors support the concept of <br /> the economic activity nodes as presented. <br /> VIC CUNNINGHAM lives next to Mr. Jim Howie. He agrees with the <br /> comments made by Mr. Howie. He is interested in knowing what will be next to <br /> then at the I-40, old NC 86 Interchange. <br /> HAROLD HARRIS owns land at the intersection of I-40 and Old NC 86. <br /> He stated that this land is not suited for residential use because of the <br /> noise from the traffic on I-40. Economic development will be more suited for <br /> this area. <br /> Commissioner Insko noted that multi-family is a permitted use in the <br /> secondary development area of the economic development node. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.