Minutes - 19921201 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

14'7 about the golf course and the use of pesticides. Research studies are showing that turf grasses are the very best pollution control methods they have right. now. In Pennsylvania they did some studies by putting on fertilizer ar. pesticides and then exposing the turf to three to six inches of rain per hour. When they trapped the water that ran off they did not detect high levels of these nutrients or pesticides. He cited other studies where they have not identified problems with the use of pesticides. They have analyzed water from ponds and wells and not found high revels of nutrients or pesticides associated with golf courses. The scientific facts indicate that the perception that golf courses provide large amounts of pollutants is not true. It is only happening where they are not following the recommendations. Some advantages with golf courses is that sludge and compost are being used as fertilizer. Commissioner Gordon asked about the levels of pollutants that are present. Mr. Lucas noted that the problem is determining the base level. They must determine what amount is already present and establish a base level. The golf courses have not contributed to the base level or caused an increase. His recommendations include the type of turf grass best for a golf course, silt fences and fertilizer control. Mr. Lucas will provide additional written material for the county Commissioners. Craig Morgan, Environmental Consulting Engineer specializing in water and wastewater management and silt sanitary systems, gave his list of credentials. He noted he takes his ethical responsibility to help protect the health, safety and welfare very seriously. He noted he objectively evaluates the relative dimensions of any controversial environmental issue and screens out irrelevant dimensions. He feels the irrelevant dimension at this time__ is a lot of the specifics of what University Station may or may not be. Wha they do in the Stoney Creek drainage basin is very relevant. The question i.... do they let this be one or two acre development with onsite septic system disposal or encourage the growth and development which will bring sewer and water to this area. Mr. Morgan stated that water and sewer can be on site but it is not without its own environmental consequences. He questioned if it is the responsibility of a developer of a select parcel to protect the entire corridor. He feels that this authority is best left in the hands of the county and the towns. In this drainage basin there is Strayhorn Hills, Colonial Dills and. Joppa Oaks.. Joppa Oaks. and Colonial Hills are - in trouble. Their septic systems are failing. He asked that people who don't wan; this development to talk to people who are trying to sell their homes in these subdivisions. In Strayhorn Hills they cannot expand their homes because they have peeked out with no reserve capacity for their septic systems. These three existing developments are contributing more pollution to the environment and allowing University Station to develop with on site wastewater disposal would not protect the water quality in the area. By putting the sewer in, they will create a mechanism by which they can clean up a lot of the existing development which is causing environmental problems in this section of Hillsborough. With regard to golf course pollution, if they caused pollution as claimed by the opponents, they would have to condemn Pinehurst. They developed a golf course on the banks of the reservoir in Southern Pines. They monitor the runoff and nothing has shown any pollution. Robert Grill, traffic engineer, sated that Mr. Collins has indicated that New Hope Church Road can handle the number of vehicle:- generated by this development. Mr. Cogswell indicated that their intent is not to hurt the environment. They are aiming at middle income people with moderate housing