Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
150 <br />sprawl. <br />'MTHERINE.C.H. KLING, RODNEY W. KLING AND KATHERINE B HARDING asked that the <br />rezoning for University Station be declined and that the land be kept as it <br />now is. <br />JANE MASKE wrote in opposition of the University Station high. density village. <br />She feels the plan can destroy the rural character of this area of the county, <br />decimate the wildlife, create an unbelievable traffic situation and dilute the <br />quality education by overcrowding the schools. <br />SUSAN MICKELL wrote in opposition to the planned University Station <br />development. Her concerns included damage to'the area, harm to wildlife, <br />water and the general environment. <br />JENNIFER MILLER asked that the County commissioners to not separate the Open <br />space decision from the Rural Character Study. She asked that schools be <br />added to the Open Space Area Development Locational criteria. <br />JOHN AND HARRIETT MOORE wrote in opposition of any efforts to rezone the area <br />proposed for the University Station development. Their concerns include <br />environmental effects of such a subdivision and especially the golf course, <br />the effects of increased traffic in the area, effects on the existing schools <br />and cost to the current residents of Orange County. <br />JAY AND DOT PENCE wrote in opposition of the rezoning which would allow <br />University Station to become a rural village. <br />"DEBRA A. PERRY AND DONNA MARNELL wrote in opposition to part of the Rural <br />Character Study proposal to the University Station project. She expressed <br />concerns about roads, schools, water, sewer and police and fire protection. <br />TRISH RAFALOW wrote in opposition of creating urban space in a rural space. <br />KAREN SANDERS RALEIGH wrote in support of University Station. She feels that <br />a planned community shows vision and forethought. <br />JOHN RINGLAND wrote in opposition to the rezoning of the University Station__ <br />development. He feels a development of this size is unwarranted, unfeasible <br />and is not likely to succeed economically. His concerns include the runoff <br />from the golf course, the traffic and the schools. <br />ROY W. ROTH asked that the applied zoning districts in the "Open-Space <br />Development Area" not include R-2 as it may relate to the potential University <br />Station development. <br />WILLIAM B. STROM wrote in opposition of the "Open Space" designation. <br />GEORGANNE SEBASTIAN AND DENNIS PFEIFFER wrote in opposition of changing the <br />land use designation for University Station to 20 year transition or the open <br />space category. She expressed concerns about schools and the effects a large <br />levelopment and golf course would have on county roads in the area. <br />LARRY D. MALL-ACE wrote that he thoroughly oppose the planned University