Minutes - 20050301 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

He said that there are many layers of planning documents, which prohibit public water or public sewer service in the rural buffer. These same agreements do not prohibit extension of public water or public sewer lines in the rural buffer, so long as service is not going to be provided in the rural buffer. Regarding the development, the County Commissioners have not seen the project for consideration because there has been no indication from the City of Durham as the proposed utility provider for this subdivision that it will serve this subdivision with public water or public sewer. He has been told that the Erwin Road route for this water line is preferred by the City of Durham. He has also been told that there is another alternative available. Chair Carey asked the Manager to ask the County Engineer to seek some clarification on the possible routes for this water line. Commissioner Gordon said that her understanding is that the City of Durham has not agreed to extend water and sewer. It is also her understanding that it would be their policy to require the line to go along a roadway but, at their discretion, it would be possible for the line to go entirely within Durham County. She said that the water line does not have to go into the rural buffer in Orange County for this development to succeed. She thinks that a separate issue is the interpretation of what the joint planning agreement says. She is not in favor of extending lines into the rural buffer and this should be made clear that it is not the practice and is not consistent with the joint planning agreement. She thinks that the intent of the agreement was not to even extend lines into the rural buffer except in certain very limited circumstances. She is curious as to whether someone could break all of these agreements by demanding a line. Geof Gledhill said that, with respect to the language in the water and sewer boundary agreement, the use of the word "lines" as opposed to the use of the word "service", was a negotiating point in the agreement. Both of the utility providers -Hillsborough and OWASA - wanted the flexibility to be able to extend lines into the rural buffer and any interest area if it was necessary to reasonably serve service areas. The agreement between OWASA and the City of Durham is more explicit. With respect to some developer breaking the agreement by forcing one of the utility providers to provide service, he said that they have done everything that a case law across the country says to do in order to make sure that public water and sewer does not bust a land use plan. Commissioner Halkiotis said that he has a real problem in making something easy for somebody in Durham that will involve the rural buffer. He has no moral obligation to bail Durham out. Commissioner Jacobs asked that a report from the County Engineer be ready by the meeting of the Durham-Orange-Chapel Hill Work Group on March 9th. John Link said that he would try. Commissioner Jacobs pointed out that there are already lines that run through the rural buffer. He agreed with Commissioner Halkiotis and said that none of the County Commissioners would take any action that would undermine the agreements that took so much work to create. Commissioner Gordon reiterated that she is a strong supporter of the rural buffer and she thinks there should be no public water and sewer in the rural buffer. 4. County Manaaer's Resort John Link said that if the Board concurs with Commissioner Halkiotis, then he would move expeditiously with the defibrillators at the senior centers. Commissioner Jacobs suggested that at least one person in each building knows how to use them.