Orange County NC Website
4 <br /> NC 54/1-40 CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> Executive Summary <br /> Overview <br /> A primary route connecting much of southern Orange, Durham and Wake Counties, as well as new growth <br /> occurring in Chatham County, with the academic and medical destinations at the University of North <br /> i <br /> Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) and the Research Triangle Park,the NC 54/1-40 corridor is facing pressures <br /> unlike many others in the region. In addition to the regional access that NC 54 provides for UNC and its <br /> medical facilities for commuters, patients and visitors from across the state and region, the corridor is <br /> facing rising traffic levels that relate both to regional growth and substantial development activity within <br /> i <br /> the corridor. NC 54 is in transition as both institutional and private development activity lead to long-term <br /> changes in the corridor's character. These potential land use changes require careful planning with needed <br /> transportation improvements to serve the long-term vitality of the corridor and its surrounding <br /> neighborhoods. With environmental, physical and policy constraints limiting expansion of portions of the <br /> roadway and the development of parallel roadway connections, the corridor requires a multimodal <br /> solution to meet future demand while improving safety for all users and traffic operations. <br /> The corridor is also extremely important to the communities in both Durham and Chapel Hill,where it serves <br /> residential and commercial land uses, creating an eclectic mix of local and regional traffic competing for <br /> limited space. The corridor is fast becoming the most congested in the region, and has begun a transition <br /> from low-density suburban development with a semi-rural feel to a more urban pattern, with approved <br /> and pending development proposals expected to accelerate that transition as the economy rebounds. <br /> With more than 600 acres of vacant developable land surrounding it and likely development of UNC- <br /> owned properties along the corridor in the next several years to expand its health care-related facilities, <br /> NC 54 is poised for dramatic changes. As a result, the corridor is rising in statewide importance and <br /> regional prominence. <br /> However, rising congestion levels threaten property values and economic growth for both jurisdictions, as <br /> well as the ability for UNC to compete for jobs and patients.There are policies in place in Chapel Hill and <br /> on the University of North Carolina campus that restrict the amount of available parking, and encourage <br /> the use of transit in reaching destinations served by this corridor. Yet the heavy traffic, high speeds and <br /> lack of multimodal facilities along the corridor create barriers that limit the usefulness and safety of <br /> walking and bicycling for transportation.This also influences transit usage,where heavy demand exists due <br /> to the parking constraints, but better pedestrian access is needed to make transit more effective as a <br /> travel option. As a result of those existing and anticipated future demands, NC 54 is an extremely <br /> complex corridor, serving multiple travel markets and a diverse array of stakeholder and community <br /> interests focused on the success of different transportation modes, protection of neighborhoods and the <br /> economic viability of their land. <br /> Study objectives <br /> In that context, the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) <br /> initiated the NC 54/1-40 Corridor Study to develop a land use -- transportation blueprint for this <br /> regionally significant corridor. With its development potential and the plan to construct a regional light rail <br /> system that would serve this corridor, the goal of the study is to define complementary land use and <br /> transportation strategies that will guide public and private actions, investments and capital project <br /> priorities to improve mobility, safety and access for all.modes. The dynamic nature of this critical corridor <br /> AUGUST 2010— DRAFT FINAL REPORT 1 <br />