Minutes - 19920922 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

. 80 fees is being handled separately from other fees. The. Countv is not considering waiving inspection fees. Commissioner Halkiotis addressed the issue.of having paid County sta available to open and close facilities, as well as being present while the facility is being used. He suggested that the county use caution and plan fora "worst case scenario" when renting these facilities. He encouraged, staff to study adopt-ing as part of the policy, a requirement that a staff person be available and paid-for-by the citizen/group using the facility. The initial report was accepted. The issues of security, cost recovery for staff people to supervise the facility, and amount of deposit for rental will be reviewed. Another report on this issue will be presented within the next 6 weeks. H. ITEMS FOR DECISION - REGULAR AGENDA I. PHASE I.I HISTORIC INVENTORY --CON-SULTANT SELECTION This item was presented by Planning Director Marvin Collins for the purpose of reconsidering the selection of a consultant to conduct the Phase II Historic inventory. On August 18, 1992.the Board of Commissioners approved the Administration recommendation to employ Dan Pezzoni and Rhonda LaFever to conduct the inventory of historic sites and structures in the remaining unincorporated portions of Orange county. The Board also authorized the Chair to execute a contract, contingent upon staff and attorney review that incorporated the terms of the approved proposal. In their 7/20/92 proposal, Pezzoni and LeFever suggested a team approach which recognized Pezzoni's extensive experience in conducting historic inventories and LaFever's skills. This proposal took into account LaFever's limited experience by requiring extensive supervision by Pezzoni. On August 31, 1992, Catherine Bishir of SHPO called the Planning Director to indicated that Dan Pezzoni had contacted her indicating that he wished to change the proposal. On September 1, 1992, Ms. Bishir sent a copy of the revised proposal to the Planning Director. On the following day, in a telephone conversation, both Ms. Bishir and Mr. Collins concluded that the proposal was no longer acceptable due to the fact that insufficient supervision was to be given,.to Ms. LaFever. On September 3, 1992 both ms. Bishir and the Planning.Director wrote to Pezzoni and LaFever that the proposal was no longer acceptable and that it would be necessary to proceed with interviewing additional candidates. To expedite the consultant selection process, the SHPO suggested that two of the three consultants originally considered for the project be considered again. They included David Bergstone and Scott Brown. In addition, the consultant team of Todd Peck and Jody Carter was also recommended for consideration. The Peck/Carter team has been suggested and extensive efforts were made to schedule a local interview and a copy of the RFP were sent to them. Although very interested in the project, prior commitments and associated travel plans prevented them from responding to either request. Sheets summarizing the consultant proposals were provided in lieu of complete copies. These summaries provided the following information: Consultant/Firm -Experience _ -Performance Notes -Project Schedule -Qualifications -Budget Proposal The consultant(s) must satisfy minimum education and experience requirements to perform identification, evaluation, registration and treatment activities. These requirements are listed in Part V: 36CFR61 of the Federal Register and are included for information purposes. Mr. Collins indicated that Peck/Carter,have presented a proposal.